Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391019›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2018

Evaluation of the Deadly Liver Mob program: insights for roll-out and scale-up of a pilot program to engage Aboriginal Australians in hepatitis C and sexual health education, screening, and care.

Carla Treloar, Max Hopwood, Elena Cama, Veronica Saunders, L Clair Jackson, Melinda Walker, Catriona Ooi, Ashley Ubrihien, James Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carla TreloarCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. c.treloar@unsw.edu.au.
Max HopwoodCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Elena CamaCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Veronica SaundersCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
L Clair JacksonCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Melinda WalkerCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Catriona OoiWestern Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Ashley UbrihienWestern Sydney HIV and Related Programs Unit, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
James WardSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUSydney Local Health District · AUSydney Sexual Health Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeadly Liver Mob (DLM) is a peer-driven, incentivised health promotion program aimed at increasing understanding of hepatitis C, promoting harm reduction in relation to injecting drug use, and linking participants to screening for hepatitis C, other blood borne viruses and sexually transmissible infections among Aboriginal people in Western Sydney, NSW. This paper presents the evaluation of a pilot study examining the acceptability of the program as a first step of a scalability assessment.

methodsDeadly Liver Mob operated in co-located needle and syringe programs and sexual health clinics in two sites: (Site 1: two and a half years for 2 days/week; Site 2: 1 year for 1 day per week). Comparisons were made of the proportion of Aboriginal clients (Site 1) and occasions of service provided to Aboriginal clients (Site 2) in the 12 months prior and post-introduction of DLM. Interviews were conducted with 13 staff involved in delivery of DLM and with 19 clients.

resultsA total of 655 and 55 Aboriginal clients, respectively, attended Site 1 and Site 2 for health education. The proportion of Aboriginal clients attending both sites was significantly higher during the DLM compared with prior to its implementation. Of those attending for health education, 79 and 73%, respectively, attended screening following education. DLM clients strongly endorsed the program. Some staff were concerned about workforce capacity to effectively engage Aboriginal clients with multiple and complex needs, managing the differing aims of the participating services involved, and about offering of incentives for attendance at health services.

conclusionWhile acceptability was high among staff and clients and preliminary results show high engagement with Aboriginal communities, this evaluation of a pilot program raises some issues to consider in scale up of DLM to other sites. The initiation of additional DLM sites should address issues of alignment with governing strategies and workforce capacity.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHarm ReductionHealth EducationHealth PromotionHepatitis CHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationAboriginal AustraliansHepatitis CImplementationIncentivesSTIs

Identifiers

PMID29391019
PMCPMC5796347
OpenAlexW2793194568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.