Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29391008›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Adherence to home fortification with micronutrient powders in Kenyan pre-school children: self-reporting and sachet counts compared to an electronic monitoring device.

Emily M Teshome, Veronica S Oriaro, Pauline E A Andango, Andrew M Prentice, Hans Verhoef

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02073149 (Comparison of Home Fortification With Two Iron Formulations in Kenyan Children Protected Against Malaria by Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02073149 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Home Fortification With Two Iron Formulations in Kenyan Children Protected Against Malaria by Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy: a Placebo-controlled Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2014 to 2014Enrolled338ConditionsAnaemiaArmsLow-dose iron as NaFeEDTA, Conventional dose iron as ferrous salt, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily M TeshomeMRCG Keneba at MRC Unit The Gambia, and MRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Emily.Teshome@lshtm.ac.uk.
Veronica S OriaroMaseno University, School of Public Health and Community Development, Maseno, Kenya.
Pauline E A AndangoMaseno University, School of Public Health and Community Development, Maseno, Kenya.
Andrew M PrenticeMRCG Keneba at MRC Unit The Gambia, and MRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hans VerhoefMRCG Keneba at MRC Unit The Gambia, and MRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U123292699Medical Research Council MC_UU_00026/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of home fortification with iron-containing micronutrient powders varies between trials, perhaps in part due to population differences in adherence. We aimed to assess to what extent adherence measured by sachet count or self-reporting forms is in agreement with adherence measured by electronic device. In addition, we explored how each method of adherence assessment (electronic device, sachet count, self-reporting forms) is associated with haemoglobin concentration measured at the end of intervention; and to what extent baseline factors were associated with adherence as measured by electronic device.

methodsThree hundred thirty-eight rural Kenyan children aged 12-36 months were randomly allocated to three treatment arms (home fortification with two different iron formulations or placebo). Home fortificants were administered daily by parents or guardians over a 30 day-intervention period. We assessed adherence using an electronic device that stores and provides information of the time and day of opening of the container that was used to store the fortificants sachets in each child's residence. In addition, we assessed adherence by self-reporting and sachet counts. We also measured haemoglobin concentration at the end of intervention.

resultsAdherence, defined as having received at least 24 sachets (≥ 80%), during the 30-day intervention period was attained by only 60.6% of children as assessed by the electronic device. The corresponding values were higher when adherence was assessed by self-report (83.9%; difference: 23.3%, 95% CI: 18.8% to 27.8%) or sachet count (86.3%; difference: 25.7%, 95% CI: 21.0% to 30.4%). Among children who received iron, each 10 openings of the electronic cap of the sachet storage container were associated with an increase in haemoglobin concentration at the end of intervention by 1.2 g/L (95% CI: 0.0 to 1.9 g/L). Adherence was associated with the age of the parent but not with intervention group; with age, sex or anthropometric indices of the child; or with age or sex of the parent or guardian.

conclusionsThe use of self -reporting and sachet count may lead to overestimates of adherence to home fortification.

trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02073149 ) on 25 February 2014.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringFood, FortifiedAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyChild, PreschoolData CollectionFemaleHumansInfantIronKenyaMaleMicronutrientsMonitoring, PhysiologicPowdersReproducibility of ResultsRural PopulationIronMicronutrientsPowdersChildFood, fortifiedIronKenyaPatient compliancePreschoolSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID29391008
PMCPMC5796300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.