Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390968›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

General practitioner contributions to achieving sustained healthcare for offenders: a qualitative study.

Cath Quinn, Katie Denman, Philippa Smithson, Christabel Owens, Rod Sheaff, John Campbell, Ian Porter, Jill Annison, Richard Byng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding the organisational influences on the quality of and access to primary care in English prisons: a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cath QuinnPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. cath.quinn@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4644-4603
Katie DenmanPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
Philippa SmithsonPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
Christabel OwensUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Rod SheaffPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Ian PorterUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Jill AnnisonPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
Richard ByngPlymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
University of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/1713/210Department of Health 09/1801/1063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOffenders frequently have substantial healthcare needs and, like many other socially marginalised groups, often receive healthcare in inverse proportion to their needs. Improved continuity of healthcare over time could contribute to addressing these needs. General Practitioners need to be able to support people with complex social and medical problems, even in systems that are not specifically designed to manage individuals with such degrees of complexity. We aimed to examine offenders' perspectives on factors that contributed to, or worked against, creating and sustaining their access to healthcare.

methodsFrom a sample of 200 participants serving community or prison sentences in South West (SW) and South East (SE) England, who were interviewed about their health care experiences as part of the Care for Offenders: Continuity of Access (COCOA) study, we purposively sampled 22 participants for this sub-study, based on service use. These interviews were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analytic approach initially applied 5 a priori codes based on access and different components of continuity. Data were then examined for factors that contributed to achieving and disrupting access and continuity.

resultsParticipants described how their own life situations and behaviours contributed to their problems in accessing healthcare and also identified barriers created by existing access arrangements. They also highlighted how some General Practitioners used their initiative and skills to 'workaround' the system, and build positive relationships with them; feeling listened to and building trust were particularly valued, as was clear communication. Limitations faced by General Practitioners included a lack of appropriate services to refer people to, where the offender patients would meet the access criteria, and disagreements regarding medication prescriptions.

conclusionsGeneral Practitioners can make a positive contribution to supporting access to healthcare for an under-served population by facilitating more flexible and less formal access arrangements, by using their relationship skills, and by problem-solving. General Practitioners should recognise their potential to transform people's experience of healthcare whilst working in imperfect systems, particularly with vulnerable and marginalised groups who have complex medical and social needs.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCriminalsGeneral PractitionersHealth Services AccessibilityPhysician-Patient RelationsEnglandHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchAccessContinuityGeneral practitionerOffendersPrimary careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29390968
PMCPMC5796354
OpenAlexW2785504433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.