Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390955›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2018

Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates.

Emily H Waide, Christopher K Tuggle, Nick V L Serão, Martine Schroyen, Andrew Hess, Raymond R R Rowland, Joan K Lunney, Graham Plastow, Jack C M Dekkers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily H WaideDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Christopher K TuggleDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Nick V L SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Martine SchroyenDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Andrew HessDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Raymond R R RowlandCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Joan K LunneyUSDA, ARS, BARC, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Graham PlastowUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-7577
Iowa State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

USDA NIFA PRRS CAP 2008-55620-19132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic prediction of the pig's response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation datasets from populations with different genetic backgrounds that were challenged with different PRRSV isolates.

resultsGenomic prediction accuracy averaged 0.34 for viral load (VL) and 0.23 for weight gain (WG) following experimental PRRSV challenge, which demonstrates that genomic selection could be used to improve response to PRRSV infection. Training on WG data during infection with a less virulent PRRSV, KS06, resulted in poor accuracy of prediction for WG during infection with a more virulent PRRSV, NVSL. Inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are in linkage disequilibrium with a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 4 was vital for accurate prediction of VL. Overall, SNPs that were significantly associated with either trait in single SNP genome-wide association analysis were unable to predict the phenotypes with an accuracy as high as that obtained by using all genotyped SNPs across the genome. Inclusion of data from close relatives into the training population increased whole genome prediction accuracy by 33% for VL and by 37% for WG but did not affect the accuracy of prediction when using only SNPs in the major QTL region.

conclusionsResults show that genomic prediction of response to PRRSV infection is moderately accurate and, when using all SNPs on the porcine SNP60 Beadchip, is not very sensitive to differences in virulence of the PRRSV in training and validation populations. Including close relatives in the training population increased prediction accuracy when using the whole genome or SNPs other than those near a major QTL.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineViral LoadWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID29390955
PMCPMC5801659
OpenAlexW2801392460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.