Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2018
Real-Time Detection of Infusion Site Failures in a Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02773875 (A Randomized Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Fault Detection Algorithms Using the ZoneMPC Algorithm and DiAs System in Adult Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes in the Outpatient Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Fault Detection Algorithms Using the ZoneMPC Algorithm and DiAs System in Adult Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes in the Outpatient Setting
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Early Stages of Automated Insulin Delivery.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Metabolic Models, in Silico Trials, and Algorithms.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Early Stages of Automated Insulin Delivery.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Toward Automation: The Road Traveled and Road Ahead for Integrating Automated Insulin Delivery into Inpatient Care.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Development of a Real-time Force-based Algorithm for Infusion Failure Detection.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Frequency and Detection of Insulin Infusion Site Failure in the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Online Community.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Machine Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Algorithms to Alert Patients Using Sensor Augmented Pump of Infusion Site Failures.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- Human-in-the-Loop Insulin Dosing.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Realizing a Closed-Loop (Artificial Pancreas) System for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.Endocrine reviews · 2019Review
- Detection of Insulin Pump Malfunctioning to Improve Safety in Artificial Pancreas Using Unsupervised Algorithms.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Article
- Design and Clinical Evaluation of the Interoperable Artificial Pancreas System (iAPS) Smartphone App: Interoperable Components with Modular Design for Progressive Artificial Pancreas Research and Development.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs evidence emerges that artificial pancreas systems improve clinical outcomes for patients with type 1 diabetes, the burden of this disease will hopefully begin to be alleviated for many patients and caregivers. However, reliance on automated insulin delivery potentially means patients will be slower to act when devices stop functioning appropriately. One such scenario involves an insulin infusion site failure, where the insulin that is recorded as delivered fails to affect the patient's glucose as expected. Alerting patients to these events in real time would potentially reduce hyperglycemia and ketosis associated with infusion site failures.
methodsAn infusion site failure detection algorithm was deployed in a randomized crossover study with artificial pancreas and sensor-augmented pump arms in an outpatient setting. Each arm lasted two weeks. Nineteen participants wore infusion sets for up to 7 days. Clinicians contacted patients to confirm infusion site failures detected by the algorithm and instructed on set replacement if failure was confirmed.
resultsIn real time and under zone model predictive control, the infusion site failure detection algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 88.0% (n = 25) while issuing only 0.22 false positives per day, compared with a sensitivity of 73.3% (n = 15) and 0.27 false positives per day in the SAP arm (as indicated by retrospective analysis). No association between intervention strategy and duration of infusion sets was observed ( P = .58).
conclusionsAs patient burden is reduced by each generation of advanced diabetes technology, fault detection algorithms will help ensure that patients are alerted when they need to manually intervene. Clinical Trial Identifier: www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT02773875.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.