Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390879›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2017

Circumferential Esophageal Replacement by a Tissue-engineered Substitute Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Experimental Study in Mini Pigs.

Jonathan Catry, Minh Luong-Nguyen, Lousineh Arakelian, Tigran Poghosyan, Patrick Bruneval, Thomas Domet, Laurent Michaud, Rony Sfeir, Frederic Gottrand, Jerome Larghero and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Esophagus engineering tackles function.Nature biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan Catry1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Minh Luong-Nguyen1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Lousineh Arakelian1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Tigran Poghosyan1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Patrick Bruneval4 Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Thomas Domet1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Laurent Michaud5 Reference Center for Congenital and Malformative Esophageal Diseases, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Université Lille 2, Lille, France.
Rony Sfeir6 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, University Lille 2, Lille, France.
Frederic Gottrand5 Reference Center for Congenital and Malformative Esophageal Diseases, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Université Lille 2, Lille, France.
Jerome Larghero1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Valerie Vanneaux1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre Cattan1 Cell Therapy Unit and CIC-BT, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Hôpital Saint-Louis · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering appears promising as an alternative technique for esophageal replacement. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could be of interest for esophageal regeneration. Evaluation of the ability of an acellular matrix seeded with autologous MSCs to promote tissue remodeling toward an esophageal phenotype after circumferential replacement of the esophagus in a mini pig model. A 3 cm long circumferential replacement of the abdominal esophagus was performed with an MSC-seeded matrix (MSC group, n = 10) versus a matrix alone (control group, n = 10), which has previously been matured into the great omentum. The graft area was covered with an esophageal removable stent. A comparative histological analysis of the graft area after animals were euthanized sequentially is the primary outcome of the study. Histological findings after maturation, overall animal survival, and postoperative morbidity were also compared between groups. At postoperative day 45 (POD 45), a mature squamous epithelium covering the entire surface of the graft area was observed in all the MSC group specimens but in none of the control group before POD 95. Starting at POD 45, desmin positive cells were seen in the graft area in the MSC group but never in the control group. There were no differences between groups in the incidence of surgical complications and postoperative death. In this model, MSCs accelerate the mature re-epitheliazation and early initiation of muscle cell colonization. Further studies will focus on the use of cell tracking tools in order to analyze the becoming of these cells and the mechanisms involved in this tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsEsophagusMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSwineSwine, MiniatureTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldsacellular matrixesophageal stentingesophaguslarge animal modelmesenchymal stem cellstissue engineeringtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID29390879
PMCPMC5802636
OpenAlexW2794061088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.