Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390797›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018

Combining degradations: The effect of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech.

Sarah E Yoho, Stephanie A Borrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bilingual Perception of Dysarthric Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah E YohoDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321, USA.
Stephanie A BorrieDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321, USA.

Funding

Speech rhythm entrainment in the context of dysarthriaR21DC016084 · NIDCD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BORRIE, STEPHANIE ANNA · 2017 to 2019
$429k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech was assessed. Speech-shaped noise was mixed with neurologically healthy (control) and disordered (dysarthric) speech at a series of signal-to-noise ratios. In addition, bandpass filtered control and dysarthric speech conditions were assessed to determine the effect of noise on both naturally and artificially degraded speech. While significant effects of both the amount of noise and the type of speech were revealed, no interaction between the two factors was observed, in either the broadband or filtered testing conditions. Thus, it appears that there is no multiplicative effect of the presence of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech relative to control speech. That is, the decrease in intelligibility due to increasing levels of noise is similar for both types of speech, and both types of testing conditions, and the function for dysarthric speech is simply shifted downward due to the inherent source degradations of the speech itself. Last, large-scale online crowdsourcing via Amazon Mechanical Turk was utilized to collect data for the current study. Findings and implications for this data and data collection approach are discussed.

Indexed as

Perceptual MaskingSpeech AcousticsSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAudiometry, SpeechCase-Control StudiesCrowdsourcingDysarthriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29390797
PMCPMC5775095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.