Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390743›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018

Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Daniel E Shearer, Michelle R Molis, Keri O Bennett, Marjorie R Leek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel E ShearerNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Healthcare System. Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Michelle R MolisNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Healthcare System. Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Keri O BennettNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Healthcare System. Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Marjorie R LeekNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Healthcare System. Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.

Funding

HEARING LOSS AND THE PERCEPTION OF COMPLEX SOUNDSR01DC000626 · NIDCD · U.S. WALTER REED ARMY MED CENTER · PI LEEK, MARJORIE R. · 1989 to 2013
$2.8M
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Short-Term Institutional Research Training Grant (T35)T35DC008764 · NIDCD · PORTLAND VA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. · PI DAWN L KONRAD-MARTIN · 2007 to 2026
$485k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000626NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with hearing loss are thought to be less sensitive to the often subtle variations of acoustic information that support auditory stream segregation. Perceptual segregation can be influenced by differences in both the spectral and temporal characteristics of interleaved stimuli. The purpose of this study was to determine what stimulus characteristics support sequential stream segregation by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Iterated rippled noises (IRNs) were used to assess the effects of tonality, spectral resolvability, and hearing loss on the perception of auditory streams in two pitch regions, corresponding to 250 and 1000 Hz. Overall, listeners with hearing loss were significantly less likely to segregate alternating IRNs into two auditory streams than were normally hearing listeners. Low pitched IRNs were generally less likely to segregate into two streams than were higher pitched IRNs. High-pass filtering was a strong contributor to reduced segregation for both groups. The tonality, or pitch strength, of the IRNs had a significant effect on streaming, but the effect was similar for both groups of subjects. These data demonstrate that stream segregation is influenced by many factors including pitch differences, pitch region, spectral resolution, and degree of stimulus tonality, in addition to the loss of auditory sensitivity.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCuesAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAuditory ThresholdCase-Control StudiesFemaleHearingHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesPitch PerceptionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29390743
PMCPMC5785299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.