Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390579›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Single posterior surgical management for lumbosacral tuberculosis: titanium mesh versus iliac bone graft: A retrospective case-control study.

Xin H Yin, Zhong K Liu, Bao R He, Ding J Hao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh versus bone graft alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness of structural and non-structural bone graft fusion in treatment of single segment thoracic tuberculosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation and Management of Pyogenic and Tubercular Spine Infections.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin H YinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, China.
Zhong K Liu
Bao R He
Ding J Hao
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the one-stage posterior approach for treating spinal tuberculosis (TB) has gained popularity. However, large bony defects after debridement remain a major challenge in posterior surgery. The present retrospective study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of posterior-only surgical management by titanium mesh versus iliac bone grafts for treating lumbosacral TB. This was a retrospective cohort study. From January 2006 to April 2012, 36 patients with lumbosacral TB were treated at our department. The 36 cases were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients in Group A (titanium mesh) underwent one-stage posterior internal fixation, debridement, and titanium mesh bone fusion. The 19 patients in Group B (iliac bone graft) underwent posterior instrumentation, debridement, and iliac bone graft in a single procedure. The clinical and radiographic results for the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. The mean year of patients was 49.9 ± 15.4 months in group A and 55.5 ± 12.6 months in group B. All patients were followed up for an average of 47.3 ± 8.1 months (range 36-60 months). Spinal TB was completely cured and no intraspinal infection and central nervous system complications of TB infection occurred. Bone fusion was achieved 6.4 ± 1.9 months in group A and 7.8 ± 2.1 months in group B. There was no significant statistical difference in bone fusion between the 2 groups (P > .05). The Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI) significantly improved between the preoperative and the last visit in either group. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups at last visit (P > .05). There were significant differences between groups regarding the postoperative lumbosacral angle and angle correction loss at the final follow-up (P < .05). The average operative complication rate of Group A was less than that of Group B. Both iliac bone and titanium mesh can effectively construct anterior column defects in posterior surgery. The titanium mesh has the advantage of minor surgical invasion, effective reconstruction of large defects, and ideal sagittal alignment in lumbosacral TB for patients with osteoporosis and poor iliac bone quality.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshBone TransplantationCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIliumLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSacrumTitaniumTuberculosis, SpinalTitanium

Identifiers

PMID29390579
PMCPMC5758281
OpenAlexW2778886089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.