Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29390535›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for infantile colic: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Pedro Gutiérrez-Castrellón, Flavia Indrio, Alexis Bolio-Galvis, Carlos Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Irma Jimenez-Escobar, Gabriel López-Velázquez

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The effectiveness ofTranslational pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  11. ProbioticNutrients · 2024
    Article
  12. Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nutrients · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Extracellular membrane vesicles fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Gutiérrez-CastrellónCenter for Translational Research on Early Programming Nutrition and Mother-Child Nutrition, Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea González & Dirección de Investigación. Universidad Tecnológica de México-Unitec México University of Bari, Bari, Italy Universidad Tecnológica de México-Unitec, México Center for Analysis on Health Evidence, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González Head of Medical Division, Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea González Genetic Biochemistry Department, Instituto Nacional de Pediatria.
Flavia Indrio
Alexis Bolio-Galvis
Carlos Jiménez-Gutiérrez
Irma Jimenez-Escobar
Gabriel López-Velázquez
Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez · MXTechnological University of Mexico · MXUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background5% to 40% of infants cry excessively, usually accompanied by fussiness and excessive of gas. There are no uniform criteria for treatment of infantile colic. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 has been used with promising results. The objective of this network-meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the efficacy of L reuteri DSM 17938 with other interventions for infantile colic.

methodsRCTs, published between 1960 and 2015 for the treatment of infantile colic were included. Primary outcome was duration of crying after 21 to 28 days of treatment. Different databases were searched. Information was analyzed using control group as central axis. A random effect model was used. Hedges standard mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated. A SUCRA analysis was performed to evaluate superiority for each intervention.

results32 RCTs were analyzed, including 2242 patients. Studies with L reuteri DSM 17938 versus Ctrl., Diet versus Ctrl. and Acupuncture versus Ctrl. were the most influential studies in the NMA. L reuteri DSM 17938 [WMD -51.3 h (CI95% -72.2 to -30.5 h), P .0001] and dietetic approaches [WMD -37.4 h (CI95% -56.1 to -18.7 h), P .0001] were superior compared to the other treatments.

conclusionsL reuteri DSM 17938 and some dietetic approaches are better to other interventions for treatment of infantile colic.

Indexed as

Limosilactobacillus reuteriColicDiet TherapyHumansInfantModels, StatisticalOdds RatioProbioticsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29390535
PMCPMC5758237
OpenAlexW2777907776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.