ArticleMedicine2017
Silent aspiration in infants with Prader-Willi syndrome identified by videofluoroscopic swallow study.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxytocin in infants with Prader-Willi syndrome to improve dysphagia and disease trajectory.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Trial
- Observational
- Prader-Willi syndrome: guidance for children and transition into adulthood.Endocrine connections · 2024Article
- Prader-Willi Syndrome and Weight Gain Control: From Prevention to Surgery-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Gastric aspiration in sudden unexpected infant death of Prader-Willi syndrome: immunohistochemical detection of feeding components.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Proteins and proteases of Prader-Willi syndrome: a comprehensive review and perspectives.Bioscience reports · 2022Review
- Causes of death in Prader-Willi syndrome: lessons from 11 years' experience of a national reference center.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feeding intolerance in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) infants is well-recognized, but their swallow physiology is not well understood. Swallow dysfunction increases risks of respiratory compromise and choking, which have a high incidence in PWS. To investigate swallow pathology in PWS infants we undertook a retrospective review of videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) in infants with PWS seen at our institution. We hypothesize that VFSS will characterize swallow pathology suspected by clinical observation during a feeding evaluation and may help determine feeding safety in these infants.Retrospective review of 23 VFSS on 10 PWS infants (average age 9.7 ± 8.4 months; range 3 weeks-29 months). Logistic regression models evaluated associations between gender, genetic subtype, and growth hormone (GH) use on aspiration incidence. Polysomnographic (PSG) studies conducted on the same participant ±1 year from VFSS were examined to characterize respiratory abnormalities.There was a high rate of swallowing dysfunction (pharyngeal residue 71%, aspiration events 87%) and disordered sleep. All aspiration events were silent. There were no differences in rates of aspiration for gender, genetic subtype, or GH use.A high incidence of aspiration was identified indicating swallow dysfunction may frequently be present in infants with PWS. Comprehensive evaluation of feeding and swallowing is essential and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Providers should recognize risk factors for swallow dysfunction and consider a multidisciplinary approach to guide decision making and optimize feeding safety in PWS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.