ArticleMedicine2017
Chinese herbal medicine for patients with atrial fibrillation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network Pharmacology and Pharmacological Mechanism of CV-3 in Atrial Fibrillation.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Systems Pharmacology for Investigation of the Mechanisms of Action of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Drug Discovery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Wenxin Keli for atrial fibrillation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most clinically common cardiac arrhythmia. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been widely applied in the treatment of AF, However, to our knowledge, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails (RCTs) regarding the effectiveness of this treatment. Therefore, we provide a protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CHM for AF.
methodsThe databases reviewed to collect RCTs related to CHM treatment for AF will be as follows: 3 English literature databases, which are PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and 3 Chinese literature databases, which are CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang. The data collection in the above-mentioned databases will be from the time when the respective databases were established to December 2017. The maintenance of sinus rhythm and p-wave dispersion will be accepted as the primary outcomes. Quality of life (QOL), such as QOL scale embolic events, bleeding events, and symptom improvement (such as chest distress, palpitations, etc) will be measured as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles, abstracts, or even full texts, and extract data. Methodological quality will be evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias. All analyses will be applied by RevMan (version 5.3).
resultsThe results of study will be disseminated via both international conference and peer-review journal.
conclusionThe conclusion of our systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether CHM is an effective intervention for patient with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.