ArticleMedicine2017
A new strategy to reconstruct type III acetabular bone defect associated with inflammatory pseudotumor: combined medial and lateral acetabular bone grafting: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleInflammatory pseudotumor has been commonly reported in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported a patient who had a massive intra-pelvic pseudotumour and acetabular bone defect underwent two-stage revision THA. DIAGNOSES: A new surgical strategy for pseudotumor after THA is performed.
interventionsThorough debridement intra-pelvic pseudotumour via Smith-Petersen approach, bone grafting on iliac medial surface and plate-screw internal fixation were performed in the first stage, followed by revision of the loosened prosthesis to a cementless primary prosthesis in the second stage. OUTCOMES: A follow-up for 5 years showed satisfactory recovery of function. LESSONS: This surgical revision is less invasive than conventional methods, resulting in a stable and well-functioning hip joint after mid-term follow-up for 5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.