ArticlePloS one2018
Vineyard water status assessment using on-the-go thermal imaging and machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Recent Methods for Evaluating Crop Water Stress Using AI Techniques: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Grapevine Research: A Comparative Study with an Extensive Review of Datasets, Diseases, and Techniques Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Smart Crop Water Stress Index-Based IoT Solution for Precision Irrigation of Wine Grape.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparing Nadir and Oblique Thermal Imagery in UAV-Based 3D Crop Water Stress Index Applications for Precision Viticulture with LiDAR Validation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Towards the automation of NIR spectroscopy to assess vineyard water status spatial-temporal variability from a ground moving vehicle.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Automatic Crop Canopy Temperature Measurement Using a Low-Cost Image-Based Thermal Sensor: Application in a Pomegranate Orchard under a Permanent Shade Net House.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of soil temperature in mediterranean vineyards in a climate change context.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- AI-assisted image analysis and physiological validation for progressive drought detection in a diverse panel ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Water Stress Identification of Winter Wheat Crop with State-of-the-Art AI Techniques and High-Resolution Thermal-RGB Imagery.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Updated Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- High-Throughput Phenotyping: A Platform to Accelerate Crop Improvement.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Modeling of Wine Sensory Profiles and Color of Vertical Vintages of Pinot Noir Based on Chemical Fingerprinting, Weather and Management Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Evaluation of some non-invasive approaches for the detection of red palm weevil infestation.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high impact of irrigation in crop quality and yield in grapevine makes the development of plant water status monitoring systems an essential issue in the context of sustainable viticulture. This study presents an on-the-go approach for the estimation of vineyard water status using thermal imaging and machine learning. The experiments were conducted during seven different weeks from July to September in season 2016. A thermal camera was embedded on an all-terrain vehicle moving at 5 km/h to take on-the-go thermal images of the vineyard canopy at 1.2 m of distance and 1.0 m from the ground. The two sides of the canopy were measured for the development of side-specific and global models. Stem water potential was acquired and used as reference method. Additionally, reference temperatures Tdry and Twet were determined for the calculation of two thermal indices: the crop water stress index (CWSI) and the Jones index (Ig). Prediction models were built with and without considering the reference temperatures as input of the training algorithms. When using the reference temperatures, the best models casted determination coefficients R2 of 0.61 and 0.58 for cross validation and prediction (RMSE values of 0.190 MPa and 0.204 MPa), respectively. Nevertheless, when the reference temperatures were not considered in the training of the models, their performance statistics responded in the same way, returning R2 values up to 0.62 and 0.65 for cross validation and prediction (RMSE values of 0.190 MPa and 0.184 MPa), respectively. The outcomes provided by the machine learning algorithms support the use of thermal imaging for fast, reliable estimation of a vineyard water status, even suppressing the necessity of supervised acquisition of reference temperatures. The new developed on-the-go method can be very useful in the grape and wine industry for assessing and mapping vineyard water status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.