Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29389959›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Improved tools and strategies for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: A research-to-policy forum.

Piero Olliaro, Florence Fouque, Axel Kroeger, Leigh Bowman, Raman Velayudhan, Ana Carolina Santelli, Diego Garcia, Ronald Skewes Ramm, Lokman H Sulaiman, Gustavo Sanchez Tejeda and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strain-specific quantification ofFrontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Piero OlliaroUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florence FouqueUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Axel KroegerUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Leigh BowmanDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Raman VelayudhanDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases (WHO/NTD), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ana Carolina SantelliDengue Control Program, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
Diego GarciaDepartment of Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Bogota, Colombia.
Ronald Skewes RammProgram for the Prevention and Control of Dengue, Ministry of Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Lokman H SulaimanDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Gustavo Sanchez TejedaCentro Nacional de Programas Preventivos y Control de Enfermedades (CENAPRECE), Ministry of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fabiàn Correa MoralesCentro Nacional de Programas Preventivos y Control de Enfermedades (CENAPRECE), Ministry of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ernesto GozzerUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
César Basso GarridoFacultad de Agronomia, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Luong Chan QuangDepartment for Disease Control and Prevention, Pasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Gamaliel GutierrezPAHO/AMRO, World Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Zaida E YadonPAHO/AMRO, World Health Organization, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Silvia Runge-RanzingerInstitute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-3657

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has been conducted on interventions to control dengue transmission and respond to outbreaks. A summary of the available evidence will help inform disease control policy decisions and research directions, both for dengue and, more broadly, for all Aedes-borne arboviral diseases.

methodA research-to-policy forum was convened by TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, with researchers and representatives from ministries of health, in order to review research findings and discuss their implications for policy and research.

resultsThe participants reviewed findings of research supported by TDR and others. Surveillance and early outbreak warning. Systematic reviews and country studies identify the critical characteristics that an alert system should have to document trends reliably and trigger timely responses (i.e., early enough to prevent the epidemic spread of the virus) to dengue outbreaks. A range of variables that, according to the literature, either indicate risk of forthcoming dengue transmission or predict dengue outbreaks were tested and some of them could be successfully applied in an Early Warning and Response System (EWARS). Entomological surveillance and vector management. A summary of the published literature shows that controlling Aedes vectors requires complex interventions and points to the need for more rigorous, standardised study designs, with disease reduction as the primary outcome to be measured. House screening and targeted vector interventions are promising vector management approaches. Sampling vector populations, both for surveillance purposes and evaluation of control activities, is usually conducted in an unsystematic way, limiting the potentials of entomological surveillance for outbreak prediction. Combining outbreak alert and improved approaches of vector management will help to overcome the present uncertainties about major risk groups or areas where outbreak response should be initiated and where resources for vector management should be allocated during the interepidemic period.

conclusionsThe Forum concluded that the evidence collected can inform policy decisions, but also that important research gaps have yet to be filled.

Indexed as

Research DesignAedesAnimalsArbovirus InfectionsDengueDisease OutbreaksGlobal HealthHealth PlanningHumansInsect VectorsPopulation SurveillanceRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29389959
PMCPMC5794069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.