Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29389958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A mobile health technology platform for quality assurance and quality improvement of malaria diagnosis by community health workers.

Jeremiah Laktabai, Alyssa Platt, Diana Menya, Elizabeth L Turner, Daniel Aswa, Stephen Kinoti, Wendy Prudhomme O'Meara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Healthcare Workers' Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeremiah LaktabaiDepartment of Family Medicine, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-6414
Alyssa PlattDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Diana MenyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Moi University School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya.
Elizabeth L TurnerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel AswaAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Stephen KinotiFio Corporation, Toronto, Canada.
Wendy Prudhomme O'MearaAcademic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Moi University · KEDuke University · USAMPATH · KEFio Corporation (Canada) · CA

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Innovative partnership to target antimalarial subsidies in the retail sectorR01AI110478 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PRUDHOMMEOMEARA, WENDY · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110478NIH HHS R01AI110478NIH HHS UL1TR001117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) play an important role in improving access to services in areas with limited health infrastructure or workforce. Supervision of CHWs by qualified health professionals is the main link between this lay workforce and the formal health system. The quality of services provided by lay health workers is dependent on adequate supportive supervision. It is however one of the weakest links in CHW programs due to logistical and resource constraints, especially in large scale programs. Interventions such as point of care testing using malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) require real time monitoring to ensure diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we evaluated the utility of a mobile health technology platform to remotely monitor malaria RDT (mRDT) testing by CHWs for quality improvement.

methodsAs part of a large implementation trial involving mRDT testing by CHWs, we introduced the Fionet system composed of a mobile device (Deki Reader, DR) to assist in processing and automated interpretation of mRDTs, which connects to a cloud-based database which captures reports from the field in real time, displaying results in a custom dashboard of key performance indicators. A random sample of 100 CHWs were trained and provided with the Deki Readers and instructed to use it on 10 successive patients. The CHWs interpretation was compared with the Deki Reader's automatic interpretation, with the errors in processing and interpreting the RDTs recorded. After the CHW entered their interpretation on the DR, the DR provided immediate, automated feedback and interpretation based on its reading of the same cassette. The study team monitored the CHW performance remotely and provided additional support.

resultsA total of 1251 primary and 113 repeat tests were performed by the 97 CHWs who used the DR. 91.6% of the tests had agreement between the DR and the CHWs. There were 61 (4.9%) processing and 52 (4.2%) interpretation errors among the primary tests. There was a tendency towards lower odds of errors with increasing number and frequency of tests, though not statistically significant. Of the 62 tests that were repeated due to errors, 79% achieved concordance between the CHW and the DR. Satisfaction with the use of the DR by the CHWs was high.

conclusionsUse of innovative mHealth strategies for monitoring and quality control can ensure quality within a large scale implementation of community level testing by lay health workers.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyCommunity Health WorkersQuality ImprovementTelemedicineAdultFemaleHumansKenyaMalariaMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29389958
PMCPMC5794091
OpenAlexW2792976195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.