Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29389954›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Intimate partner violence (IPV): The validity of an IPV screening instrument utilized among pregnant women in Tanzania and Vietnam.

Vibeke Rasch, Toan Ngo Van, Hanh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Rachel Manongi, Declare Mushi, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Tine Gammeltoft, Chun Sen Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04978064 (E-health Psychological Intervention in Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04978064 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

E-health Psychological Intervention in Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence (eIPV): a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsPregnancy Related, Violence, Gender-Based, Intimate Partner ViolenceArmse-health psychological counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Depression remains a neglected public health problem among pregnant women in Northwest Ethiopia.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vibeke RaschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Toan Ngo VanInstitute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hanh Thi Thuy NguyenInstitute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Rachel ManongiDepartment of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Declare MushiDepartment of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Dan W MeyrowitschDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tine GammeltoftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chun Sen WuDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a global problem that affects one-third of all women. The present study aims to develop and determine the validity of a screening instrument for the detection of IPV in pregnant women in Tanzania and Vietnam and to determine the minimum number of questions needed to identify IPV.

methodAn IPV screening instrument based on eight questions was tested on 1,116 Tanzanian and 1,309 Vietnamese women who attended antenatal care before 24 gestational weeks. The women were re-interviewed during their 30th-34th gestational week where the World Health Organization (WHO) IPV questionnaire was used as the gold standard. In all, 255 combinations of eight different questions were first tested on the Tanzanian study population where sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. In the evaluation of the performance of the question combinations, different IPV types and the frequency of abusive acts were considered. The question combinations that performed best in Tanzania were subsequently evaluated in the Vietnamese study population.

resultsIn Tanzania, a combination of three selected questions including one question on emotional IPV, one on physical IPV and one on sexual IPV was found to be most effective in identifying women who are exposed to at least one type of IPV during pregnancy (sensitivity = .80; specificity = .74). The performance of the identified combination was slightly less effective in Vietnam (sensitivity = .74; specificity = .68). Focusing on different IPV types, the best performance was found for exposure to physical IPV in both Tanzania (sensitivity = .93; specificity = .70) and Vietnam (sensitivity = .96; specificity = .55). In both countries, the sensitivity increased with the frequency of abuse whereas the specificity decreased.

conclusionBy asking pregnant women three simple questions we were able to identify women who were exposed to IPV during pregnancy in two different countries. The question combination performed best in assessing physical IPV where it identified 93% and 96% of Vietnamese and Tanzanian women, respectively, who were exposed to physical IPV.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansIntimate Partner ViolencePregnancyPregnant PeopleSexual PartnersTanzaniaVietnamYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29389954
PMCPMC5794062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.