Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29389038›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2018

Investigating capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post-translational modifications.

Klaus Faserl, Bettina Sarg, Peter Gruber, Herbert H Lindner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Peptidomics and Capillary Electrophoresis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Klaus FaserlDivision of Clinical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.
Bettina SargDivision of Clinical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.
Peter GruberDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.
Herbert H LindnerDivision of Clinical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-3256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry is a very efficient analytical method for the analysis of post-translational modifications because of its high separation efficiency and high detection sensitivity. Here we applied CE-MS using three differently coated separation capillaries for in-depth analysis of a set of 70 synthetic post-translationally modified peptides (including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration). We evaluated the results in terms of peptide detection and separation characteristics and found that the use of a neutrally coated capillary resulted in highest overall signal intensity of singly modified peptides. In contrast, the use of a bare-fused silica capillary was superior in the identification of multi-phosphorylated peptides (12 out of 15 were identified). Fast separations of approximately 12 min could be achieved using a positively coated capillary, however, at the cost of separation efficiency. A comparison to nanoLC-MS revealed that multi-phosphorylated peptides interact with the RP material very poorly so that these peptides were either washed out or elute as very broad peaks from the nano column which results in a reduced peptide identification rate (7 out of 15). Moreover, the methods applied were found to be very well suited for the analysis of the acetylated, nitrated and methylated peptides. All 36 synthetic peptides, which exhibit one of those modifications, could be identified regardless of the method applied. As a final step in this study and as a proof of principle, the phosphoproteome enriched from PC-12 pheochromocytoma cells was analyzed by CE-MS resulting in 5686 identified and 4088 quantified phosphopeptides. We compared the characterized analytes to those identified by a nanoLC-MS proteomics study and found that less than one third of the phosphopeptides were identical, which demonstrates the benefit by combining different approaches quite impressively.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, CapillaryPeptidesPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationPeptidesCE-MSNeutral coatingPhosphorylationPost-translational modification

Identifiers

PMID29389038
PMCPMC6001557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.