Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29388561›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.

Thomas Flores, Xin Lei, Tiffany Huang, Henri Lorach, Roopa Dalal, Ludwig Galambos, Theodore Kamins, Keith Mathieson, Daniel Palanker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of Recent Advances in Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces for the Restoration of Motor Function in Patients With Paralysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fabrication and Validation of Sub-Cellular Carbon Fiber Electrodes.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Micro-magnetic stimulation of primary visual cortex induces focal and sustained activation of secondary visual cortex.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial Visual Information Produced by Retinal Prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas FloresDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-3942
Xin LeiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Tiffany HuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Henri LorachDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Roopa DalalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Ludwig GalambosDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Theodore KaminsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Keith MathiesonInstitute of Photonics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Daniel PalankerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

High Resolution Photovoltaic Retinal ProsthesisR01EY018608 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2009 to 2016
$9.2M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Photovoltaic Subretinal Prosthesis with High Pixel DensityR01EY027786 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-resolution prosthetic vision requires dense stimulating arrays with small electrodes. However, such miniaturization reduces electrode capacitance and penetration of electric field into tissue. We evaluate potential solutions to these problems with subretinal implants based on utilization of pillar electrodes. APPROACH: To study integration of three-dimensional (3D) implants with retinal tissue, we fabricated arrays with varying pillar diameter, pitch, and height, and implanted beneath the degenerate retina in rats (Royal College of Surgeons, RCS). Tissue integration was evaluated six weeks post-op using histology and whole-mount confocal fluorescence imaging. The electric field generated by various electrode configurations was calculated in COMSOL, and stimulation thresholds assessed using a model of network-mediated retinal response. MAIN

resultsRetinal tissue migrated into the space between pillars with no visible gliosis in 90% of implanted arrays. Pillars with 10 μm height reached the middle of the inner nuclear layer (INL), while 22 μm pillars reached the upper portion of the INL. Electroplated pillars with dome-shaped caps increase the active electrode surface area. Selective deposition of sputtered iridium oxide onto the cap ensures localization of the current injection to the pillar top, obviating the need to insulate the pillar sidewall. According to computational model, pillars having a cathodic return electrode above the INL and active anodic ring electrode at the surface of the implant would enable six times lower stimulation threshold, compared to planar arrays with circumferential return, but suffer from greater cross-talk between the neighboring pixels. SIGNIFICANCE: 3D electrodes in subretinal prostheses help reduce electrode-tissue separation and decrease stimulation thresholds to enable smaller pixels, and thereby improve visual acuity of prosthetic vision.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedGoldNeuronsProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationRatsSiliconVisual ProsthesisGoldSilicon

Identifiers

PMID29388561
PMCPMC6503528
OpenAlexW2737971105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.