Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29388347›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2018

Confidence and Prediction Intervals for Pharmacometric Models.

Anne Kümmel, Peter L Bonate, Jasper Dingemanse, Andreas Krause

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Visual predictive check of longitudinal models and dropout.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  9. Assessment of NSCLC disease burden: A survival model-based meta-analysis study.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficient simulation of clinical target response surfaces.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Variability in Human In Vitro Enzyme Kinetics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne KümmelIntiquan GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter L BonatePharmacokinetics, Modeling, and Simulation, Astellas, Northbrook, Illinois, USA.
Jasper DingemanseDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Andreas KrauseDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supporting decision making in drug development is a key purpose of pharmacometric models. Pharmacokinetic models predict exposures under alternative posologies or in different populations. Pharmacodynamic models predict drug effects based on exposure to drug, disease, or other patient characteristics. Estimation uncertainty is commonly reported for model parameters; however, prediction uncertainty is the key quantity for clinical decision making. This tutorial reviews confidence and prediction intervals with associated calculation methods, encouraging pharmacometricians to report these routinely.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPharmacokineticsClinical Decision-MakingComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID29388347
PMCPMC6027739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.