Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29388094›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018

A technical review of the history, development and performance of the anaesthetic conserving device "AnaConDa" for delivering volatile anaesthetic in intensive and post-operative critical care.

Ron Farrell, Glen Oomen, Pauric Carey

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inhaled sevoflurane in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ron FarrellSedana Medical, The Village Center, Two Mile House, Naas, Co. Kildare, Ireland. ron.farrell@sedanamedical.com.
Glen OomenSedana Medical, Unit 306, 397 King Street West, Dundas, ON, L9H 1W9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-0088
Pauric CareySedana Medical, The Village Center, Two Mile House, Naas, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Children’s Village · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a shift in critical care to adopt volatile anaesthetics as sedatives for certain patients using mechanical ventilation. Accompanying this shift is a growing body of literature describing the advantages or disadvantages of using isoflurane or sevoflurane for long term sedation. This practise requires a cost effective, efficient and safe means to deliver these drugs that can simultaneously operate with modern critical care ventilators and ventilation protocols while protecting the care environment and care workers from excessive exposure to the drugs. The anaesthetic conserving device ("AnaConDa", Sedana Medical) is one device that delivers a safe sedative dose of either isoflurane or sevoflurane to a patient using existing critical care ventilators, common syringe pumps and gas monitors. The device is essentially a small disposable anaesthetic vaporizer and HME filter combined into one airway component. Similar to an HME filter, the device reflects moisture back to the patient, but also reflects 90% of the anaesthetic by adsorbing and releasing the drug using a proprietary carbon filament reflecting medium. This reflection reduces the total amount of anaesthetic needed, reducing that which is exhausted or scavenged upon exhalation. It can be used for 24 h of sedation, and fits into current critical care ventilator circuits almost without modifications. This article will describe the physical characteristics of the device, how it works, its development history and the performance parameters under which it can be used.

Indexed as

Ventilators, MechanicalAirway ResistanceAnesthesia, InhalationAnesthetics, InhalationCritical CareEquipment DesignHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansHypnotics and SedativesIsofluraneSevofluraneVolatilizationAnesthetics, InhalationHypnotics and SedativesIsofluraneSevofluraneAnaConDaAnaesthetic conserving deviceCritical careInhaled anaestheticIsofluraneMechanical ventilationSedationSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID29388094
PMCPMC6061082
OpenAlexW2793069357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.