Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29388033›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy.

Charlotte Bronnimann, Cristina Izquierdo, Stéphanie Cartalat, Laure Thomas, Bastien Joubert, Laura Delpech, Marc Barritault, David Meyronet, Jérôme Honnorat, François Ducray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte BronnimannHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Cristina IzquierdoHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Stéphanie CartalatHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Laure ThomasHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Bastien JoubertHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Laura DelpechHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
Marc BarritaultUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
David MeyronetUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jérôme HonnoratHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France.
François DucrayHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupe Hospitalier Est, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, 59 Bvd Pinel, 69394, Lyon Cedex, France. Francois.ducray@chu-lyon.fr.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rechallenge with temozolomide has been shown to be a valid option in selected patients with progressive glioblastoma. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of rechallenge with bevacizumab in glioblastoma patients progressing off therapy. We retrospectively identified and analyzed the characteristics of patients with glioblastoma rechallenged with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen after having received bevacizumab as first-line treatment in association with temozolomide radiochemotherapy or at recurrence in association with temozolomide, CCNU or irinotecan. Twenty-five patients were identified. In all included patients, the first bevacizumab treatment resulted in an objective response and was discontinued for reasons other than disease progression (adverse event n = 9, physician or patient decision n = 16). Median duration of first bevacizumab treatment was 6 months (range: 2-58 months). None of the patients presented a rebound effect after bevacizumab discontinuation. The median interval between discontinuation of first bevacizumab treatment and bevacizumab rechallenge was 8.9 months (range: 2-58 months). At this time, bevacizumab was given in association with lomustine (n = 17), temozolomide (n = 6), irinotecan (n = 1), or alone (n = 1). Bevacizumab rechallenge resulted in an objective response in 15 patients (60%). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 9.6 months after bevacizumab rechallenge. Timing of first bevacizumab treatment (as first-line treatment or at recurrence) was not associated with the duration of response after treatment rechallenge. In the present series, patients who responded to bevacizumab and in whom this treatment was discontinued in the absence of tumor progression seemed to benefit from rechallenge with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMutationProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseBevacizumabGlioblastomaRechallengeTherapy

Identifiers

PMID29388033
OpenAlexW2785771655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.