Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387978›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and histologic subtypes with lung adenocarcinoma.

Nozomu Motono, Aika Funasaki, Atsushi Sekimura, Katsuo Usuda, Hidetaka Uramoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. miR-17-5p/Frontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Multi-channel multi-task deep learning for predictingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nozomu MotonoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan. motono@kanazawa-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-5479
Aika FunasakiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.
Atsushi SekimuraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.
Katsuo UsudaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.
Hidetaka UramotoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status has become one of the most important factors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, the relationship between EGFR mutation and the histologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma remains to be fully elucidated. We examined the relationship between the predominant subtype of adenocarcinoma and the prognosis and investigated the correlation between a new subtype of adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations. This study included 182 patients with adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection. The rate of EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly higher among female patients, never smokers, patients with small tumors (< 3 cm in size), patients with well-differentiated tumors, and patients with a pStage I classification. The rates of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and lepidic-predominant subtype were high in male EGFR mutation-positive patients. The prevalence of the acinar and papillary-predominant subtypes was high among EGFR mutation-positive female patients, as was AIS, MIA, and the lepidic-predominant subtype. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly better than that of the EGFR mutation-negative patients (75.8 vs 67.1%, p = 0.03). However, the multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic and histologic factors did not reveal the prognostic impact of the EGFR mutation status on PFS. The overall survival (OS) of the EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly better than that of the EGFR mutation-negative patients (93.7 vs 63.4%, p < 0.01). However, in the multivariate analysis the EGFR mutation status was not significantly associated with OS.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinomaAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEGFR mutationHistologic subtypeLung adenocarcinomaPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.