Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387959›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018

Trauma Care in Mongolia: INTACT Evaluation and Recommendations for Improvement.

S Lombardo, B Unurbileg, J Gerelmaa, L Bayarbaatar, E Sarnai, R Price

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S LombardoDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. sarah.lombardo@hsc.utah.edu.
B UnurbilegDepartment of Surgery, Mongolia National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
J GerelmaaDepartment of Surgery, Mongolia National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
L BayarbaatarDepartment of Surgery, Mongolia National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
E SarnaiDepartment of Surgery, Mongolia National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
R PriceCenter for Global Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInjury is the third leading cause of death in Mongolia, with a 29% increase in motor vehicle fatalities over the past decade. Half of the population lives outside the urbanized capital of Ulaanbaatar, where access to care is limited. This study evaluates and describes the Mongolian trauma system and makes recommendations for improvements.

methodsHospital-level data were collected, and an International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma (INTACT) score (0-10) was calculated. INTACT is a validated measure for evaluating trauma capacity in developing countries based on resource availability; a score of 10 reflects ideal staffing and equipment. The survey was administered to key staff members at 10 rural and urban hospitals in spring 2016. INTACT scores were calculated for each hospital and compared to expected INTACT scores based on the World Health Organization Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care (GETC).

resultsUlaanbaatar enjoys a centralized prehospital transportation service and two appropriately resourced tertiary hospitals. Rural Mongolians rely upon regionally located tertiary facilities with similar capabilities. INTACT scores for secondary-level hospitals (n = 2) failed to meet expected GETC minimums, as did 2 of 4 primary facilities. There are no national standards guiding prehospital care, triage, or transfer. No outpatient rehabilitation facilities exist within Mongolia.

conclusionThe Mongolian trauma system utilizes regionalized care to provide emergency services. Among surveyed hospitals, 60% met GETC standards. Areas for improvement include increased resourcing of primary and secondary facilities, development of rural prehospital systems, adoption of universal standards for patient care, and creation of post-acute rehabilitation facilities.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth ResourcesHumansMongoliaWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.