ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018
Mutation rates at 42 Y chromosomal short tandem repeats in Chinese Han population in Eastern China.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing 23 Y-STR loci mutation rates in Chinese Han father-son pairs from southwestern China.Molecular biology reports · 2020Trial
- Genetic origin and forensic analysis of han populations from four districts in Shanghai, China, based on Y-chromosome STR and SNP markers.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Detection of sequence-tagged sites to reveal mechanisms of multi-step mutations at multi-copy Y-STRs in father-son pairs.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Improving the strategy to identify historical military remains: a literature review and Y-STR meta-analysis.Forensic sciences research · 2024Review
- The sequence of the repetitive motif influences the frequency of multistep mutations in Short Tandem Repeats.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sequence-based mutation patterns at 41 Y chromosomal STRs in 2 548 father-son pairs.Forensic sciences research · 2023Article
- Mutation analysis for newly suggested 30 Y-STR loci with high mutation rates in Chinese father-son pairs.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Developmental validation of the Microreader™ RM-Y ID System: a new rapidly mutating Y-STR 17-plex system for forensic application.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Deletions and duplications of 42 Y chromosomal short tandem repeats in Chinese Han population.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- The construction and application of a new 17-plex Y-STR system using universal fluorescent PCR.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Estimating Y-Str Mutation Rates and Tmrca Through Deep-Rooting Italian Pedigrees.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Mutation analysis of 13 RM Y-STR loci in Han population from Beijing of China.International journal of legal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutation analysis of 42 Y chromosomal short tandem repeats (Y-STRs) loci was performed using a sample of 1160 father-son pairs from the Chinese Han population in Eastern China. The results showed that the average mutation rate across the 42 Y-STR loci was 0.0041 (95% CI 0.0036-0.0047) per locus per generation. The locus-specific mutation rates varied from 0.000 to 0.0190. No mutation was found at DYS388, DYS437, DYS448, DYS531, and GATA_H4. DYS627, DYS570, DYS576, and DYS449 could be classified as rapidly mutating Y-STRs, with mutation rates higher than 1.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.