Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387927›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Investigation of receptor radionuclide therapy with

Silvia Nicolini, Stefano Severi, Annarita Ianniello, Maddalena Sansovini, Alice Ambrosetti, Alberto Bongiovanni, Emanuela Scarpi, Francesca Di Mauro, Alice Rossi, Federica Matteucci and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparison ofRadiology case reports · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. LutatheraPharmaceutics · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia NicoliniNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Stefano SeveriNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Annarita IannielloNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Maddalena SansoviniNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Alice AmbrosettiNuclear Medicine Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Alberto BongiovanniOsteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Emanuela ScarpiUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Francesca Di MauroNuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alice RossiRadiology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Federica MatteucciNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Giovanni PaganelliNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy. giovanni.paganelli@irst.emr.it.
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the 2010 WHO classification, a Ki-67 proliferation index of 20% is the cut-off between intermediate-grade and high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEP-NEN). However, in clinical practice, tumours with a Ki-67 index of >15% are often considered high grade and treated with chemotherapy. In 40-70% of high-grade NENs, somatostatin receptors are overexpressed, enabling peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to be performed. We investigated the role of PRRT with

methodsA total of 33 patients with advanced GEP-NENs, positive somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI+) and a Ki-67 proliferation index ranging from 15% to 70% were treated with Lu-PRRT. A cumulative activity of 18.5 GBq or 27.8 GBq of

resultsAll patients completed the intended treatment. The median follow-up was 43 months (range 3-69 months). Two patients (6%) achieved a partial response and 21 (64%) showed stable disease, giving a disease control rate (DCR) of 70%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23 months (95% CI 14.9-31.0 months) and the median overall survival was 52.9 months (95% CI 17.1-68.9 months). ROC curve analysis at 23 months revealed that the best Ki-67 index cut-off was 35%. In 23 patients (70%) the Ki-67 index was ≤35% and in 10 patients (30%) the Ki-67 index was in the range 36-70%. The DCR in the former group was 87% and 30% in the latter. The median PFS was 26.3 months (95% CI 18.4-37.7 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI 2.1-27 months), respectively (p = 0.005).

conclusionsLu-PRRT showed antitumour activity in SRI+ GEP-NENs of intermediate and high-grade. DCR and PFS were significantly better in patients with a Ki-67 index of ≤35% than in those with a Ki-67 index of >35%. On the basis of these results, PRRT should be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with high-grade SRI+ GEP-NENs, in particular those with a Ki-67 proliferation index of ≤35%.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedCell ProliferationFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadioisotopesTissue DistributionKi-67 Antigenlutetium Lu 177 dotatateOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadioisotopes177Lu-DOTATATEGEP-NECGEP-NENKi-67Neuroendocrine tumoursPRRTWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID29387927
OpenAlexW2789619206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.