ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2018
MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars.
Review in European journal of radiology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute and chronic complications of cesarean delivery: An update for the general radiologist.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- The diagnostic potential of elastosonography in cesarean scar pregnancy.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Postpartum obstetric complications: a guide for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Uterine window and placenta accreta spectrum in a dichorionic, diamniotic twin gestation complicated by postpartum hemorrhage.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Changing Paradigms in the Initial Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy at a University Hospital in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023Observational
- Article
- Acute pelvic pain: A pictorial review with magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2022Review
- Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2020Article
- The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the World Health Organization suggests 10-15% as the adequate cesarean delivery rate to assure optimal prognosis for mother and children, cesarean rates have continuously increased worldwide over the last three decades, even in primiparous women. Moreover, uterine scars after myomectomies, complications of obstetrical interventions and more recently, after fetal surgery, are often observed. This review article describes the most commonly seen complications related to prior uterine scars and discusses their imaging findings, with emphasis on the increasing role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.