Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387645›Full record

ArticleMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal

Clinical evidence of traditional

Sergio Castorina, Claudia Guglielmino, Paola Castrogiovanni, Marta Anna Szychlinska, Francesco Ioppolo, Paolo Massimino, Pietro Leonardi, Christian Maci, Maurizio Iannuzzi, Angelo Di Giunta and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer through Fast-Track Surgery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sergio CastorinaPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Claudia GuglielminoPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Paola CastrogiovanniDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Marta Anna SzychlinskaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco IoppoloPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Paolo MassiminoPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Pietro LeonardiPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Christian MaciPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Maurizio IannuzziPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Angelo Di GiuntaPolyclinic "G.B. Morgagni" Mediterranean Foundation, Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation Unit, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe MusumeciDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Human Anatomy and Histology Section, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last years, programs to enhance postoperative recovery and decrease morbidity after total knee arthroplasty, have been developed across a variety of surgical procedures and referred to as "Fast-Track Surgery". In this study we aimed to find some answers in the management of osteoarthritic patients subjected to total knee arthroplasty, by using the Fast-Track methodology. To this purpose we evaluated parameters such as early mobilization of patients, better pain management, bleeding, possible complications, reduced hospitalization time, an overall improved recovery and patient satisfaction.

methods132 patients were selected, of which, 95 treated with "Fast Track" method and 37 treated with traditional method (control group). All the patients were hospitalized and underwent the same rehabilitation program for the first three days after surgery.

resultsIn both groups, the parameters of pain and deformity demonstrated the most rapid improvement, while those of function and movement were normalized as gradual and progressive improvement over the next 2 months. The different functional test used (Barthel, MRC, VAS) showed that the mean values were significantly greater in Fast Track group when compared to the control.

conclusionThe results of the study confirm that the application of the Fast Track protocol in orthopaedics after total knee replacement results in rapid post-surgery recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Case series, low-quality cohort or case-control studies.

Indexed as

Barthel Testfast track methodologyknee jointosteoarthritistotal knee arthroplastyVAS score

Identifiers

PMID29387645
PMCPMC5774925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.