Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387586›Full record

ReviewPsoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)2015

Calcipotriol/betamethasone for the treatment of psoriasis: efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.

Christina Rogalski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina RogalskiMedical Business Development, edia. con gemeinnützige GmbH, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the advances in the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis is combined local therapy with calcipotriol and betamethasone. To provide both ingredients in a two-compound product, efforts have been made to unite calcipotriol and betamethasone because they are usually inactivated when present in the same formulation. This aspect was resolved when carefully designed vehicle components were invented (gel and ointment). This article reviews the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate.

methodsA literature search of all articles published until February 2015 was performed, including the largest medical databases. The search strategy for evaluating the main topics of this review - efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability - was defined before checking the publications.

resultsSeventy references were found and checked for relevance. For efficacy, the proportion of patients whose psoriasis improved was always significantly higher in the two-compound group compared to the group treated with the individual substances. In the context of safety, the fixed combination was generally associated with a lower risk of adverse events. In terms of patient acceptability, the fixed combination led to a significant improvement in quality of life. The two-compound product was more convenient to handle and time saving compared to former treatments.

conclusionCalcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate in a fixed combination is an effective and well-tolerated medication in mild-to-moderate psoriasis of body and scalp and, in addition, is an evidence-based treatment modality.

Indexed as

calcipotriol/betamethasoneefficacyfixed combinationpsoriasissafetytwo-compound medication

Identifiers

PMID29387586
PMCPMC5683117
OpenAlexW1934357699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.