Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387529›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

The hippocampal network model: A transdiagnostic metaconnectomic approach.

Eithan Kotkowski, Larry R Price, P Mickle Fox, Thomas J Vanasse, Peter T Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eithan KotkowskiResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Electronic address: Kotkowski@uthscsa.edu.
Larry R PriceDepartment of Mathematics, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA; College of Education, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
P Mickle FoxResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Thomas J VanasseResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Peter T FoxResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Institute for Neuroscience & Neurotechnology, Shenzhen University, Shenzen, China.

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
South Texas Medical Scientist Training Program (STX-MSTP)T32GM113896 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CAVAZOS, JOSE E · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM113896NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The hippocampus plays a central role in cognitive and affective processes and is commonly implicated in neurodegenerative diseases. Our study aimed to identify and describe a hippocampal network model (HNM) using trans-diagnostic MRI data from the BrainMap® database. We used meta-analysis to test the network degeneration hypothesis (NDH) (Seeley et al., 2009) by identifying structural and functional covariance in this hippocampal network. Methods: To generate our network model, we used BrainMap's VBM database to perform a region-to-whole-brain (RtWB) meta-analysis of 269 VBM experiments from 165 published studies across a range of 38 psychiatric and neurological diseases reporting hippocampal gray matter density alterations. This step identified 11 significant gray matter foci, or nodes. We subsequently used meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) to define edges of structural covariance between nodes from VBM data as well as functional covariance using the functional task-activation database, also from BrainMap. Finally, we applied a correlation analysis using Pearson's Key findings: Our hippocampal RtWB meta-analysis reported consistent and significant structural covariance in 11 key regions. The subsequent structural and functional MACMs showed a strong correlation between HNM nodes with a significant structural-functional covariance correlation of Significance: This novel method of studying network covariance using VBM and functional meta-analytic techniques allows for the identification of generalizable patterns of functional and structural abnormalities pertaining to the hippocampus. In accordance with the NDH, this framework could have major implications in studying and predicting spatial disease patterns using network-based assays.

Indexed as

Brain MappingGray MatterHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalNerve NetALEAnatomic likelihood estimationBrainMapFunctional covarianceFunctional MRIGray matter densityHippocampal network modelHippocampusMACMMagnetic resonance imagingMeta-analysisMeta-analytic connectivity modelingMRIStructural covarianceStructural MRIVBMVoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID29387529
PMCPMC5789756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.