Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387506›Full record

ArticleMRS communications2017

Electrospun aniline-tetramer-

A G Guex, C D Spicer, A Armgarth, A Gelmi, E J Humphrey, C M Terracciano, S Harding, M M Stevens

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MRS communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A G GuexDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
C D SpicerDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
A ArmgarthDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
A GelmiDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
E J HumphreyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
C M TerraccianoNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
S HardingNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
M M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RM/13/1/30157Medical Research Council MR/K026682/1Medical Research Council MR/L012677/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conjugated polymers have been proposed as promising materials for scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. The restricted processability and biodegradability of conjugated polymers limit their use for biomedical applications however. Here we synthesised a block-

Indexed as

biomedicalelectrical propertiespolymers

Identifiers

PMID29387506
PMCPMC5788276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.