ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018
Prospective validation of patient fatigue questionnaire (FACIT-F) for fatigue assessment in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a Card Game for Assessment and Intervention in the Person and the Family in Palliative Care: "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Impact of Surgical Treatment with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer on Disorders in the Urinary System and Quality of Life in Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Impact ofCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2020Article
- Partial Protection of Paclitaxel-induced Neurotoxicity by Antioxidants.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Change in Anticancer Drug Sensitivity During Neuronal Differentiation of PC12 Cells.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the recent introduction of a stronger regimen for pancreatic carcinoma, patients undergoing chemotherapy present high incidences of fatigue. The feasibility and validity of evaluating fatigue by questionnaire for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPC) receiving this recent regimen of chemotherapy remains unclear. Enrolled patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire (FACIT-F, version 4), a questionnaire regarding additional concerns, a numerical rating scale test concerning loss of appetite, an evaluation of degree of pain and sensory disorder, and the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) before undergoing nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy. Questionnaires and tests were completed on registration day, and then weekly during therapy over an 8-week period as the initial two cycles of continuous regimen. This trial is registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000021758). Between April 2016 and September 2016, 10 consecutive patients with URPC, including metastatic (n=4) and locally advanced pancreatic (n=6) cancer, were registered, and scheduled for nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy. The mean maximum values of fatigue degree increased from mean baseline values in all categories of the questionnaire (6-500%). The degree of fatigue presented a spike pattern over a 4-week scheduled period as one cycle of regimen in time-sequence diagram regarding 10/13 (77%) questionnaires. The PNQ concerning sensory/motor disorder also demonstrated a spike pattern and an increase from the baseline as the number of administrations. It is valid and feasible to assess fatigue by FACIT-F questionnaire for patients with URPC undergoing nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy, and to detect detailed changes in accordance with scheduled cycles of chemotherapy regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.