Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29387403›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018

Prospective validation of patient fatigue questionnaire (FACIT-F) for fatigue assessment in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy.

Ken-Ichi Okada, Seiko Hirono, Manabu Kawai, Motoki Miyazawa, Atsushi Shimizu, Yuji Kitahata, Masaki Ueno, Shinya Hayami, Toshio Shimokawa, Hiroki Yamaue

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing a Card Game for Assessment and Intervention in the Person and the Family in Palliative Care: "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact ofCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken-Ichi OkadaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Seiko HironoSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Manabu KawaiSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Motoki MiyazawaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Atsushi ShimizuSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Yuji KitahataSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Masaki UenoSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Shinya HayamiSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaDepartment of Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Hiroki YamaueSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
Wakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the recent introduction of a stronger regimen for pancreatic carcinoma, patients undergoing chemotherapy present high incidences of fatigue. The feasibility and validity of evaluating fatigue by questionnaire for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPC) receiving this recent regimen of chemotherapy remains unclear. Enrolled patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire (FACIT-F, version 4), a questionnaire regarding additional concerns, a numerical rating scale test concerning loss of appetite, an evaluation of degree of pain and sensory disorder, and the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) before undergoing nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy. Questionnaires and tests were completed on registration day, and then weekly during therapy over an 8-week period as the initial two cycles of continuous regimen. This trial is registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000021758). Between April 2016 and September 2016, 10 consecutive patients with URPC, including metastatic (n=4) and locally advanced pancreatic (n=6) cancer, were registered, and scheduled for nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy. The mean maximum values of fatigue degree increased from mean baseline values in all categories of the questionnaire (6-500%). The degree of fatigue presented a spike pattern over a 4-week scheduled period as one cycle of regimen in time-sequence diagram regarding 10/13 (77%) questionnaires. The PNQ concerning sensory/motor disorder also demonstrated a spike pattern and an increase from the baseline as the number of administrations. It is valid and feasible to assess fatigue by FACIT-F questionnaire for patients with URPC undergoing nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine therapy, and to detect detailed changes in accordance with scheduled cycles of chemotherapy regimen.

Indexed as

chemotherapyfatiguegemcitabinenab-paclitaxelpancreatic carcinomapatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID29387403
PMCPMC5769298
OpenAlexW2765433878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.