ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2018
Multi-institutional Analysis of Surgical Management and Outcomes of Mandibular Fracture Repair in Adults.
Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques and Biomaterials.Cureus · 2026Review
- Predictors for complications and the removal of osteosynthesis material after mandibular fractures: a retrospective analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Who's on Call? Mandibular Fracture Management at a Level I Trauma Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Treatment of Mandible Fractures.JAMA facial plastic surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mandibular fractures are rare, most commonly occurring in young male patients who present with facial trauma. The etiology, incidence, and presentation vary among previous publications depending on cultural and socioeconomic factors of the region of origin. This multi-institutional study aims to present demographic characteristics, surgical treatment, and clinical outcomes of surgical repair of mandible fractures in the United States. An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) adult databases of the years 2006 through 2014 was performed identifying 940 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, version 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis of either closed or open fracture of the mandible. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative details were categorized and evaluated for these two cohorts. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect risk factors related to any complications. Patients were predominantly male (85.7%), young with a mean age of 34.0 ± 14.8 years, and relatively healthy with body mass index of 23.6 ± 8.2 and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2 (84.4%). However, more than half were regular smokers (51.1%). The top five most frequent procedures performed for mandibular repair were exclusively open surgical approaches with internal, external, or interdental fixation in both cohorts. Patients with open fractures were more often admitted as emergencies, treated inpatient, required longer operative times, and presented with more contaminated wounds (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.