Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29386974›Full record

ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2017

Target-controlled Infusion Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anaesthesia for Emergency Traumatic Brain Surgery: Comparison of the Outcomes.

Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan, Yusnizah Mohd Nasir, Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini, Wan Fadzlina Wan Muhd Shukeri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan HassanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Jalan Sultanah Zainab II, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Yusnizah Mohd NasirDepartment of Anaesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Jalan Sultanah Zainab II, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Rhendra Hardy Mohamad ZainiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Jalan Sultanah Zainab II, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Wan Fadzlina Wan Muhd ShukeriDepartment of Anaesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Jalan Sultanah Zainab II, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe choice of anaesthetic techniques is important for the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) emergency surgery. The objective of this study was to compare patient outcomes for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia.

methods

resultsDemographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Differences in Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at discharge were not significant between Group T and Group S (

conclusionTCI propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia were comparable in the outcomes of TBI patients after emergency surgery.

Indexed as

Glasgow Outcome Scaleinfusionpropofoltraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID29386974
PMCPMC5772817
OpenAlexW2769764253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.