Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29386866›Full record

ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2018

Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options.

Kristie N Tu, Janette D Lie, Chew King Victoria Wan, Madison Cameron, Alaina G Austel, Jenny K Nguyen, Kevin Van, Diana Hyun

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06866561 (The Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Bone Formation and Resorption Markers And The Quality of Life Tests in Postmenopausal Osteopenic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 309 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
43.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06866561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Bone Formation and Resorption Markers And The Quality of Life Tests in Postmenopausal Osteopenic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorBursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsPostmenopausal OsteopeniaArmsaerobic exercise, cholecalciferol, calcium carbonate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 525 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Pro-Osteogenic Effect of the Nutraceutical BlastiMin ComplexInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Bone-loading exercises versus risedronate for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristie N Tu
Janette D Lie
Chew King Victoria Wan
Madison Cameron
Alaina G Austel
Jenny K Nguyen
Kevin Van
Diana Hyun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 10 million men and women in the U.S. have osteoporosis,1 a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone density and deterioration of bone architecture that increase the risk of fractures.2 Osteoporosis-related fractures can increase pain, disability, nursing home placement, total health care costs, and mortality.3 The diagnosis of osteoporosis is primarily determined by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using noninvasive dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis medications include bisphosphonates, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitors, estrogen agonists/antagonists, parathyroid hormone analogues, and calcitonin.3-6 Emerging therapies utilizing novel mechanisms include a cathepsin K inhibitor and a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin.7,8 While professional organizations have compiled recommendations for the management of osteoporosis in various populations, a consensus has yet to develop as to which is the gold standard; therefore, economic evaluations have been increasingly important to help guide decision-makers. A review of cost-effectiveness literature on the efficacy of oral bisphosphonates has shown alendronate and risedronate to be most cost-effective in women with low BMD without previous fractures.9 Guidelines are inconsistent as to the place in therapy of denosumab (Prolia, Amgen). In economic analyses evaluating treatment of postmenopausal women, denosumab outperformed risedronate and ibandronate; its efficacy was comparable to generic alendronate, but it cost more.10 With regard to older men with osteoporosis, denosumab was also found to be cost-effective when compared with bisphosphonates and teriparatide (Forteo, Lilly).11.

Identifiers

PMID29386866
PMCPMC5768298
OpenAlexW2979992936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.