Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29386632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A 5-year field study showed no apparent effect of the Bt transgenic 741 poplar on the arthropod community and soil bacterial diversity.

Lihui Zuo, Runlei Yang, Zhixian Zhen, Junxia Liu, Lisha Huang, Minsheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effect of T-DNA Integration on Growth of TransgenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Environmental Behaviors ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Impact ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Safety evaluation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Efficient Transformation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Elevated COPeerJ · 2020
    Article
  14. Optimization of theFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lihui ZuoInstitute of Forest Biotechnology, Forestry College, Agricultural University of Hebei, 071000, Baoding, PR China.
Runlei YangHebei Key Laboratory for Tree Genetic Resources and Forest Protection, 071000, Baoding, PR China.
Zhixian ZhenInstitute of Forest Biotechnology, Forestry College, Agricultural University of Hebei, 071000, Baoding, PR China.
Junxia LiuInstitute of Forest Biotechnology, Forestry College, Agricultural University of Hebei, 071000, Baoding, PR China.
Lisha HuangBiomicsTech Co.L td, 100083, Beijing, PR China.
Minsheng YangInstitute of Forest Biotechnology, Forestry College, Agricultural University of Hebei, 071000, Baoding, PR China. yangms100@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China is currently the only country that has commercialized genetically engineered tree species, and this has attracted worldwide attention. As a perennial tree species, transgenic poplar has a long growth cycle and needs to be tested for long-term ecological risks. The main purpose of this study was to explore the ecological safety of perennial transgenic poplars in arthropod community, physical and chemical properties of soil, gene flow, and soil microbial diversity. The study found transgenic poplars could effectively inhibit the number of pests. Moreover, transgenic poplar 741 did not affect the stability of the arthropod community. Studies on the microbial diversity of poplar showed that transgenic poplars did not affect the physical and chemical properties of the soil and the soil microbial community structure. Furthermore, the microbial community structure was obviously affected by location and season. The results showed that a 5-year-old transgenic 741 poplar did not pose an ecological risk, and did not affect the microbial community structure or functional diversity. This study provides a reference for the ecological security evaluation of transgenic poplars, and provides a theoretical basis for promoting the commercialization of transgenic poplars.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyAnimalsArthropodsBacillus thuringiensisDiscriminant AnalysisGene FlowPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulusPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSpecies SpecificityTransgenesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID29386632
PMCPMC5792429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.