Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29386331›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2018

Unexpected conformational variations of the human centromeric chromatin complex.

Jitendra Thakur, Steven Henikoff

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-Efficiency Genomic Mapping of Chromatin-Associated Targets with CUT&RUN.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mapping separase-mediated cleavage in situ.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  8. Epigenetic patterns in a complete human genome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The solid and liquid states of chromatin.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Sequence, Chromatin and Evolution of Satellite DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Architectural RNA in chromatin organization.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genomic methods in profiling DNA accessibility and factor localization.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Alpha satellite DNA biology: finding function in the recesses of the genome.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jitendra ThakurHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Steven HenikoffHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-8685
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

FHCRC High-Performance Computing ClusterS10OD020069 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD020069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We combined classical salt fractionation with chromatin immunoprecipitation to recover human centromeric chromatin under native conditions. We found that >85% of the total centromeric chromatin is insoluble under conditions typically used for native chromatin extraction. To map both soluble and insoluble chromatin in situ, we combined CUT&RUN (cleavage under targets and release using nuclease), a targeted nuclease method, with salt fractionation. Using this approach, we observed unexpected structural and conformational variations of centromere protein A (CENP-A)-containing complexes on different α-satellite dimeric units within highly homogenous arrays. Our results suggest that slight α-satellite sequence differences control the structure and occupancy of the associated centromeric chromatin complex.

Indexed as

CentromereCentromere Protein ACentromere Protein BChemical FractionationChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, SatelliteHumansK562 CellsSolubilityCENPB protein, humanCentromere Protein ACentromere Protein Bcentromere protein CChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, Satellitecentromereschromatinmethodology

Identifiers

PMID29386331
PMCPMC5828391
OpenAlexW2787242654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.