ArticleCirculation2018
Hospital Variation in Adherence Rates to Secondary Prevention Medications and the Implications on Quality.
Article in Circulation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Medication Adherence Predictive of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Blood Pressure Control? The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).American journal of hypertension · 2022Trial
- Impact of a Copayment Reduction Intervention on Medication Persistence and Cardiovascular Events in Hospitals With and Without Prior Medication Financial Assistance Programs.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A polypill strategy for lipid lowering and anti-platelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: A pilot randomized controlled trial.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma in Elderly Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Income-Level and Immigrant Status Are Associated With Discontinuation of Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Therapies After Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Understanding the Burden of Myocardial Infarction and Patient Preferences for Treatment: A Real-World Study Assessing Patients' Perspectives via an Online Survey.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025Article
- Discrepancy between Subjective and Objective Measurements for the Evaluation of Medication Adherence-A Cross-Sectional Study in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Adherence to Medications in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease in Oman.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Optimising adherence to secondary prevention medications following acute coronary syndrome utilising telehealth cardiology pharmacist clinics: a matched cohort study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- Long-Term Outcomes and Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: The Veterans Affairs Extended DAPT Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- The impact of on-site cardiac surgical backup on clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome-analysis of the ACSIS national registry.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Use of machine learning to predict medication adherence in individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Generating Practice-Based Evidence in the Use of Guideline-Recommended Combination Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Outcome of acute myocardial infarction versus stable coronary artery disease patients treated with coronary bypass surgery.Annals of medicine · 2021Article
- Variations in Quality of Care by Sex and Social Determinants of Health Among Younger Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the US and Canada.JAMA network open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedication adherence is important to improve the long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized that there is significant variation among US hospitals in terms of medication adherence after MI, and that patients treated at hospitals with higher medication adherence after MI will have better long-term cardiovascular outcomes.
methodsWe identified 19 704 Medicare patients discharged after acute MI from 347 US hospitals participating in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines) from January 2, 2007, to October 1, 2010. Using linked Medicare Part D prescription filling data, medication adherence was defined as proportion of days covered >80% within 90 days after discharge. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events among hospitals with high, moderate, and low 90-day medication adherence.
resultsBy 90 days after MI, overall rates of adherence to medications prescribed at discharge were 68% for β-blockers, 63% for statins, 64% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and 72% for thienopyridines. Adherence to these medications up to 90 days varied significantly among hospitals: β-blockers (proportion of days covered >80%; 59% to 75%), statins (55% to 69%), thienopyridines (64% to 77%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (57% to 69%). Compared with hospitals in the lowest quartile of 90-day composite medication adherence, hospitals with the highest adherence had lower unadjusted and adjusted 2-year major adverse cardiovascular event risk (27.5% versus 35.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96). High-adherence hospitals also had lower adjusted rates of death or readmission (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.96), whereas there was no difference in mortality after adjustment.
conclusionsUse of secondary prevention medications after discharge varies significantly among US hospitals and is inversely associated with 2-year outcomes. Hospitals may improve medication adherence after discharge and patient outcomes through better coordination of care between inpatient and outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.