Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29386007›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2018

Cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment at an ambulatory geriatric unit based on the AGe-FIT trial.

Martina Lundqvist, Jenny Alwin, Martin Henriksson, Magnus Husberg, Per Carlsson, Anne W Ekdahl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01446757 (Effectiveness of a Comprehensive CGA on Frailty in Community-dwelling Elderly People - A Randomised, Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01446757 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Comprehensive CGA on Frailty in Community-dwelling Elderly People - A Randomised, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2011 to 2014Enrolled383ConditionsFrail Elderly, DeathsArmsThe intervention group, control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fitness and frailty in myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Review
  15. Health Centres 75+ as a New Model to Improve Care for Older People in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martina LundqvistDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. martina.lundqvist@liu.se.
Jenny AlwinDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Martin HenrikssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus HusbergDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Per CarlssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anne W EkdahlDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division of Clinical geriatrics, Karolinska Institute (KI), Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people with multi-morbidity are increasingly challenging for today's healthcare, and novel, cost-effective healthcare solutions are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at an ambulatory geriatric unit for people ≥75 years with multi-morbidity.

methodThe primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a CGA strategy with usual care in a Swedish setting. Outcomes were estimated over a lifelong time horizon using decision-analytic modelling based on data from the randomized AGe-FIT trial. The analysis employed a public health care sector perspective. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% per annum and are reported in 2016 euros.

resultsCompared with usual care CGA was associated with a per patient mean incremental cost of approximately 25,000 EUR and a gain of 0.54 QALYs resulting in an ICER of 46,000 EUR. The incremental costs were primarily caused by intervention costs and costs associated with increased survival, whereas the gain in QALYs was primarily a consequence of the fact that patients in the CGA group lived longer.

conclusionCGA in an ambulatory setting for older people with multi-morbidity results in a cost per QALY of 46,000 EUR compared with usual care, a figure generally considered reasonable in a Swedish healthcare context. A rather simple reorganisation of care for older people with multi-morbidity may therefore cost effectively contribute to meet the needs of this complex patient population.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01446757 . September, 2011.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareComprehensive Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodSwedenAmbulatory careComprehensive geriatric assessmentCost-effectivenessMulti-morbidityQuality-adjusted life years

Identifiers

PMID29386007
PMCPMC5793378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.