Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385986›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Transcriptome profiling of lentil (Lens culinaris) through the first 24 hours of Ascochyta lentis infection reveals key defence response genes.

Mahsa Khorramdelazad, Ido Bar, Paul Whatmore, Gabrielle Smetham, Vijay Bhaaskaria, Yuedong Yang, Shahla Hosseini Bai, Nitin Mantri, Yaoqi Zhou, Rebecca Ford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahsa KhorramdelazadGlycomics institute, School of Sciences, Griffith University, 58 Parklands Dr., Southport, Gold Coast, 4215, QLD, Australia.
Ido BarEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd., Nathan, 4111, QLD, Australia. i.bar@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-4233
Paul WhatmoreEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd., Nathan, 4111, QLD, Australia.
Gabrielle SmethamFish Nutrition and Feed Safety, the National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Strandgaten 229, Bergen, 5002, Norway.
Vijay BhaaskariaFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 142 University St., Parkville, 3053, VIC, Australia.
Yuedong YangPangenomics Group, School of Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, 3083, VIC, Australia.
Shahla Hosseini BaiGlycomics institute, School of Sciences, Griffith University, 58 Parklands Dr., Southport, Gold Coast, 4215, QLD, Australia.
Nitin MantriEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd., Nathan, 4111, QLD, Australia.
Yaoqi ZhouPangenomics Group, School of Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, 3083, VIC, Australia.
Rebecca FordGlycomics institute, School of Sciences, Griffith University, 58 Parklands Dr., Southport, Gold Coast, 4215, QLD, Australia.
Griffith University · AURMIT University · AUDirectorate of Fisheries · NOThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Grains Research and Development Corporation CUR00014Grains Research and Development Corporation CUR00023National Health and Medical Research Council 1059775National Health and Medical Research Council 1083450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAscochyta blight, caused by the fungus Ascochyta lentis, is one of the most destructive lentil diseases worldwide, resulting in over $16 million AUD annual loss in Australia alone. The use of resistant cultivars is currently considered the most effective and environmentally sustainable strategy to control this disease. However, little is known about the genes and molecular mechanisms underlying lentil resistance against A. lentis.

resultsTo uncover the genetic basis of lentil resistance to A. lentis, differentially expressed genes were profiled in lentil plants during the early stages of A. lentis infection. The resistant 'ILL7537' and susceptible 'ILL6002' lentil genotypes were examined at 2, 6, and 24 h post inoculation utilising high throughput RNA-Sequencing. Genotype and time-dependent differential expression analysis identified genes which play key roles in several functions of the defence response: fungal elicitors recognition and early signalling; structural response; biochemical response; transcription regulators; hypersensitive reaction and cell death; and systemic acquired resistance. Overall, the resistant genotype displayed an earlier and faster detection and signalling response to the A. lentis infection and demonstrated higher expression levels of structural defence-related genes.

conclusionsThis study presents a first-time defence-related transcriptome of lentil to A. lentis, including a comprehensive characterisation of the molecular mechanism through which defence against A. lentis is induced in the resistant lentil genotype.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantAscomycotaGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunity, InnateLens PlantMycosesPlant DiseasesAscochyta lentisDefence responseDe novo assemblyFabaceaeLens culinarisLentilRNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis

Identifiers

PMID29385986
PMCPMC5793396
OpenAlexW2788318073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.