Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385955›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2018

Psychiatric Case Review and Treatment Intensification in Collaborative Care Management for Depression in Primary Care.

Nathaniel A Sowa, Philip Jeng, Amy M Bauer, Joseph M Cerimele, Jürgen Unützer, Yuhua Bao, Lydia Chwastiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Treating IBD? Don't Forget that Mental Health Matters.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathaniel A SowaDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Philip JengDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Amy M BauerDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Joseph M CerimeleDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Jürgen UnützerDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Yuhua BaoDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.
Lydia ChwastiakDr. Sowa, Dr. Bauer, Dr. Cerimele, Dr. Unützer, and Dr. Chwastiak are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Mr. Jeng and Dr. Bao are with the Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College, New York.

Funding

Value-based Purchasing in Implementation of Depression Care in Community ClinicsR01MH104200 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BAO, YUHUA · 2014 to 2016
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined whether psychiatric case review was associated with depression medication modification in a large implementation program of collaborative care for depression in safety-net primary care clinics.

methodsRegistry data were examined from an implementation of the collaborative care model in Washington State. A total of 14,960 adults from 178 primary care clinics who initiated care between January 1, 2008, and September 30, 2014, and who had a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of 10 or higher were included. Rates of psychiatric case reviews and receipt of new depression medications were extracted from the registry for all patients and for a subset of patients who did not improve by eight weeks of treatment (did not achieve a PHQ-9 score of less than 10 or a reduction in PHQ-9 score of 50% or more, compared with baseline).

resultsOne-half of patients received a new depression medication. Psychiatric case review in any given month was associated with a doubling of the probability of receiving a new medication in the following month. Among patients who did not improve by eight weeks of treatment, a psychiatric case review during weeks 8-12 was associated with a higher rate of receipt of new medications during weeks 8-16 or weeks 8-20.

conclusionsIn a collaborative care program, psychiatric case review was associated with higher rates of subsequent receipt of a new depression medication. This finding supports the importance of psychiatric case review in reducing clinical inertia in collaborative care treatment of depression.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDepressive DisorderDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMedical AuditMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareRegistriesAntidepressive Agentsclinical inertiaCollaborative careDepressionsafety net

Identifiers

PMID29385955
PMCPMC6063310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.