Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385954›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2018

Identifying Recipients of Electroconvulsive Therapy: Data From Privately Insured Americans.

Samuel T Wilkinson, Edeanya Agbese, Douglas L Leslie, Robert A Rosenheck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Electroconvulsive therapy and autobiographical memory.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Defining a Neurostimulation-Focused Subspecialty: Perspectives Inspired by a Debate at the 2023 Clinical TMS Society Annual Meeting.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel T WilkinsonDr. Wilkinson and Dr. Rosenheck are with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Rosenheck is also with the VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, Connecticut. Ms. Agbese is with the Department of Public Health Sciences, and Dr. Leslie is with the Departments of Public Health Sciences and Psychiatry, all at Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey.
Edeanya AgbeseDr. Wilkinson and Dr. Rosenheck are with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Rosenheck is also with the VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, Connecticut. Ms. Agbese is with the Department of Public Health Sciences, and Dr. Leslie is with the Departments of Public Health Sciences and Psychiatry, all at Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey.
Douglas L LeslieDr. Wilkinson and Dr. Rosenheck are with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Rosenheck is also with the VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, Connecticut. Ms. Agbese is with the Department of Public Health Sciences, and Dr. Leslie is with the Departments of Public Health Sciences and Psychiatry, all at Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey.
Robert A RosenheckDr. Wilkinson and Dr. Rosenheck are with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Rosenheck is also with the VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, Connecticut. Ms. Agbese is with the Department of Public Health Sciences, and Dr. Leslie is with the Departments of Public Health Sciences and Psychiatry, all at Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey.
Connecticut Mental Health Center · US

Funding

Research Training in Functional Disability InterventionsT32MH062994 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MORRIS D. · 2002 to 2017
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH111000NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH062994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), limited epidemiologic research has been conducted to identify rates of ECT use and characteristics of patients who receive ECT. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with ECT use were examined among patients with mood disorders in the MarketScan commercial insurance claims database.

methodsAmong individuals with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those who received ECT and those who did not were compared by using bivariate effect size comparisons and multivariate logistic regression.

resultsAmong unique individuals in the 2014 MarketScan database (N=47,258,528), the ECT utilization rate was 5.56 ECT patients per 100,000 in the population. Of the 969,277 patients with a mood disorder, 2,471 (.25%) received ECT. Those who received ECT had substantially higher rates of additional comorbid psychiatric disorders (risk ratio [RR]=5.70 for any additional psychiatric disorder), numbers of prescription fills for any psychotropic medication (Cohen's d=.77), rates of any substance use disorder (RR=1.97), and total outpatient psychotherapy visits (Cohen's d=.49). The proportion of patients with a mood disorder who received ECT in the West (.19%) was substantially lower than in other U.S. regions (.28%). This difference was almost entirely accounted for by one western state comprising 59.1% of patients in that region.

conclusionsUse of ECT is exceptionally uncommon and limited to patients with extensive multimorbidity and high levels of service use. ECT utilization is most limited in areas of the country where regulatory restrictions are greatest.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBipolar DisorderDatabases, FactualElectroconvulsive TherapyFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMultimorbidityUnited StatesYoung AdultAntidepressantsbipolar disorderDepressionelectroconvulsive therapyEpidemiology

Identifiers

PMID29385954
PMCPMC6248332
OpenAlexW2792270412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.