Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385952›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2018

Peer-Led Self-Management of General Medical Conditions for Patients With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Trial.

Benjamin G Druss, Manasvini Singh, Silke A von Esenwein, Gretl E Glick, Stephanie Tapscott, Sherry Jenkins Tucker, Cathy A Lally, Evelina W Sterling

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin G DrussDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Manasvini SinghDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Silke A von EsenweinDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Gretl E GlickDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Stephanie TapscottDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Sherry Jenkins TuckerDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Cathy A LallyDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Evelina W SterlingDr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Kennesaw State University · US

Funding

A Peer-Led, Medical Disease Self-Management Program for Mental Health ConsumersR01MH090584 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRUSS, BENJAMIN G · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population.

methodsThis randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months.

resultsAt six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant.

conclusionsThe HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePeer GroupAdultChronic DiseaseComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSelf-ManagementMedical morbidity and mortality in psychiatric patientspeer specialistsPublic-sector psychiatryself-managementserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID29385952
PMCPMC5930018
OpenAlexW2789811941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.