Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385784›Full record

ReviewInternational neurourology journal2018

Laparoscopic Approach for Intravesical Surgery Using Pneumovesicum in Urology: Literature Review.

Bum Sik Tae, Hoon Choi, Jae Young Park, Jae Hyun Bae

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International neurourology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficiency and Diagnostic Utility of COJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pneumovesical vesicovaginal fistula repair: Lessons learned from an initial series of 25 patients.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bum Sik TaeDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2963-7366
Hoon ChoiDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8481-8103
Jae Young ParkDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-6846
Jae Hyun BaeDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9862-3545
Korea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly being used in the management of various urological diseases. In particular, the laparoscopic approach for intravesical surgery using pneumovesicum (LPV) is a minimally invasive alternative with potential advantages including decreased morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmesis. We review the applications of LPV in urology, summarize data for different surgical approaches, and provide an overview of patient management, as well as other considerations. This narrative review focused primarily on articles indexed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase databases. No formal search strategy was used, and no meta-analysis of data was performed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPneumovesicumTransvesicoscopyUrology

Identifiers

PMID29385784
PMCPMC5798636
OpenAlexW2787622726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.