Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385625›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2019

Should I Stay or Should I Go? FMRI Study of Response Inhibition in Early Illness Schizophrenia and Risk for Psychosis.

Susanna L Fryer, Brian J Roach, Judith M Ford, Kayla R Donaldson, Vince D Calhoun, Godfrey D Pearlson, Kent A Kiehl, Vinod H Srihari, Thomas H McGlashan, Scott W Woods and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Stability of mismatch negativity event-related potentials in a multisite study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Susanna L FryerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Brian J RoachMental Health, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Judith M FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Kayla R DonaldsonMental Health, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Kent A KiehlThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM.
Vinod H SrihariDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Thomas H McGlashanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Scott W WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Yale University · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USMind Research Network · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

8/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082022 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, SCOTT W · 2008 to 2018
$6.0M
Functional Brain Abnormalities in the Schizophrenia ProdromeR01MH076989 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHALON, DANIEL H · 2007 to 2014
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076989NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition (RI) is a component of the cognitive control systems that support optimal cognition. Cognitive control deficits are well-described in schizophrenia, but are not well characterized in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during Go/NoGo task performance was collected from 30 CHR youth, 23 early illness schizophrenia patients (ESZ), and 72 healthy adolescents and young adults (HC). Voxelwise main effects of group were examined (P < .005 height threshold, family-wise error-corrected cluster threshold, P < .05) for correct NoGo-Go contrast values and task-based functional connectivity. CHR and ESZ groups had slower and more variable reaction times (RT) on Go trials compared to HCs. Significant main effects of group in bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and right inferior frontal cortex stemmed from CHR and ESZ groups showing significantly less NoGo-Go activation, relative to HCs. Faster responding HCs had less functional coupling between dACC and medial prefrontal cortex, a default mode network (DMN) region during NoGo vs Go trials. This functional connectivity-performance relationship was not present in ESZ or CHR groups. The pattern of findings suggests CHR and ESZ groups were deficient in developing strong and consistent prepotent responding, based on their slow and variable motor responses and decreased engagement of dACC and right inferior frontal regions implicated in inhibitory control. Furthermore, only the control group showed a functional connectivity relationship consistent with greater response prepotency requiring more decoupling of inhibitory control regions from DMN regions during RI.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultConnectomeExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexProdromal SymptomsPsychomotor PerformancePsychotic DisordersRiskSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29385625
PMCPMC6293268
OpenAlexW2790376671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.