Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385584›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2018

Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.

Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alanna Kulchak RahmGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Lindsay BaileyGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Kara FultzGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Audrey FanGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Janet L WilliamsGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Adam BuchananGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
F Daniel DavisGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Michael F MurrayGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Marc S WilliamsGeisinger Health System Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA.

Funding

OMOP information model for eMERGE phenotypingU01HG008679 · NHGRI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI WILLIAMS, MARC S. · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little evidence is available to guide returning genomic results in children without medical indication for sequencing. Professional guidelines for returning information on adult-onset conditions are conflicting. The goal of this study was to provide preliminary information on parental attitudes and expectations about returning medically actionable genomic results in children who have been sequenced as part of a population biobank.Four focus groups of parents with a child enrolled in a population biobank were conducted. A deliberative engagement format included education about professional guidelines and ethical issues around returning results to children. Parents were presented two scenarios where their healthy child has a pathogenic variant for: (a) a medically actionable childhood condition; (b) a hereditary cancer syndrome with no medical management until adulthood. Thematic analysis was conducted on verbatim transcripts. Regardless of the scenario, parents stated that the genomic information was important, was like other unexpected medical information, and disclosure should be tailored to the child's age and result. Parents wanted the results in their child's medical record. Reasons for learning adult-onset results in their healthy children included to prepare their child for necessary medical action in adulthood. Parents also provided suggestions for program design. This preliminary evidence suggests that parents desire genomic results and expect to use this information to protect their child's health. More empirical research on psychosocial adjustment to such information with continued engagement of parents and children is needed to further inform how to best support families in the communication and use of genomic information.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentBiological Specimen BanksChildChild, PreschoolDisclosureFemaleFocus GroupsGenomeHealth CommunicationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAdult-onset conditionsChildrenGenetic testingGenomicsParental AttitudesQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID29385584
PMCPMC6257004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.