ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2018
Effectiveness of an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention when implemented by frontline providers.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carefully conducted randomized trials have established that sexual behavior change interventions can significantly reduce intervention participants' risk of acquiring HIV. Establishing the effectiveness of these evidence-based interventions when implemented by frontline HIV prevention service providers is increasingly important in order to achieve maximum public health impact. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention when implemented by frontline HIV prevention service providers. We evaluated Sisters Informing Sisters on Topics about AIDS (SISTA), an HIV prevention intervention for heterosexual African American women, as implemented by four AIDS service organizations. Women enrolled in HIV counseling, testing, and referral (CTR) at each agency served as contemporaneous controls. Measures included self-reported number of occasions of unprotected vaginal intercourse and number of vaginal sex partners in the previous 90 days. 1,262 participants completed baseline and follow-up assessments across both conditions (SISTA = 537 [57%]; CTR = 725 [62%]). In the full sample of HIV-negative women, CTR participants' odds of having had unprotected sex decreased over time by 38% while SISTA participants' odds of having had unprotected sex did not change. Similar results were found among only those participants who had sex at baseline. Hypothesized interaction effects indicating positive changes in sexual risks over time for SISTA participants were not observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.