Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385159›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: A complex systematic review.

Aron Naimi-Akbar, Margareta Hultin, Anna Klinge, Björn Klinge, Sofia Tranæus, Bodil Lund

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Current Orthognathic Practice in India: Do We Need to Change?Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aron Naimi-AkbarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5248-9202
Margareta HultinDepartment of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna KlingeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Malmo University, Malmo, Sweden.
Björn KlingeDepartment of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sofia TranæusDepartment of Dental Medicine, Division of Cariology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bodil LundDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Malmö University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn orthognathic surgery, antibiotics are prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infection. However, there is lack of consensus over the appropriate drug, the dose and duration of administration. The aim of this complex systematic review was to assess the effect of antibiotics on postoperative infections in orthognathic surgery.

methodsBoth systematic reviews and primary studies were assessed. Medline (OVID), The Cochrane Library (Wiley) and EMBASE (embase.com), PubMed (non-indexed articles) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publications were searched. The primary studies were assessed using GRADE and the systematic reviews by AMSTAR.

resultsScreening of abstracts yielded 6 systematic reviews and 36 primary studies warranting full text scrutiny. In total,14 primary studies were assessed for risk of bias. Assessment of the included systematic reviews identified two studies with a moderate risk of bias, due to inclusion in the meta-analyses of primary studies with a high risk of bias. Quality assessment of the primary studies disclosed one with a moderate risk of bias and one with a low risk. The former compared a single dose of antibiotic with 24 hour prophylaxis using the same antibiotic; the latter compared oral and intravenous administration of antibiotics. Given the limited number of acceptable studies, no statistical analysis was undertaken, as it was unlikely to contribute any relevant information.

conclusionWith respect to antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery, most of the studies to date have been poorly conducted and reported. Thus scientific uncertainty remains as to the preferred antibiotic and the optimal duration of administration.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29385159
PMCPMC5791956
OpenAlexW2793126152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.