Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29385130›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

GSimp: A Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach for metabolomics studies.

Runmin Wei, Jingye Wang, Erik Jia, Tianlu Chen, Yan Ni, Wei Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The polyunsaturated fatty acid and oxylipin plasma signature of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, case-control study.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Runmin WeiMetabolomics Shared Resource, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7707-0160
Jingye WangMetabolomics Shared Resource, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-0003
Erik JiaHigh School, Punahou School, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Tianlu ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus and Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yan NiMetabolomics Shared Resource, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1779-7266
Wei JiaMetabolomics Shared Resource, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-8994

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
Gut microbiota mediated bile acid alterations in hepatic carcinogenesisU01CA188387 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI JIA, WEI · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS U01 CA188387NIH HHS 1U01CA188387-01A1NIH HHS P30 CA071789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left-censored missing values commonly exist in targeted metabolomics datasets and can be considered as missing not at random (MNAR). Improper data processing procedures for missing values will cause adverse impacts on subsequent statistical analyses. However, few imputation methods have been developed and applied to the situation of MNAR in the field of metabolomics. Thus, a practical left-censored missing value imputation method is urgently needed. We developed an iterative Gibbs sampler based left-censored missing value imputation approach (GSimp). We compared GSimp with other three imputation methods on two real-world targeted metabolomics datasets and one simulation dataset using our imputation evaluation pipeline. The results show that GSimp outperforms other imputation methods in terms of imputation accuracy, observation distribution, univariate and multivariate analyses, and statistical sensitivity. Additionally, a parallel version of GSimp was developed for dealing with large scale metabolomics datasets. The R code for GSimp, evaluation pipeline, tutorial, real-world and simulated targeted metabolomics datasets are available at: https://github.com/WandeRum/GSimp.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalProgramming LanguagesAlgorithmsBile Acids and SaltsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualFatty Acids, NonesterifiedHumansLimit of DetectionMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisProbabilityBile Acids and SaltsFatty Acids, Nonesterified

Identifiers

PMID29385130
PMCPMC5809088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.