ArticleMedicine2017
A retrospective study of optimal surgical management for occult breast carcinoma: Mastectomy or quadrantectomy?
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best treatment options for occult breast cancer: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The sequelae of mastectomy and quadrantectomy with respect to the reaching movement in breast cancer survivors: evidence for an integrated rehabilitation protocol during oncological care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment for occult breast carcinoma (OBC) remain controversial because of no detectable primary lesions. We aimed to analyze optimal surgical management for OBC.A total of 26 female patients diagnosed with OBC, which were based on available criteria, were collected at a single clinic center from January 2005 to May 2016. We classified all patients into 4 groups: group A1, mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) + radiotherapy (RT); group A2, mastectomy with ALND; group B1, quadrantectomy with ALND + RT; group B2, quadrantectomy with ALND. Patient characteristics, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared between groups.There were 14 cases in group A1, 5 cases in group A2, 4 cases in group B1, and 3 cases in group B2. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Compared with OBC patients treated with quadrantectomy, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate of those treated with mastectomy had significantly improved (A1 vs. B1, DFS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.018, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.001-0.241, P = .002; OS: HR 0.002, 95% CI 0.000-0.102, P = .002). Patients treated with radiotherapy had higher local recurrence and OS rate compared with patients treated with no radiotherapy on univariate survival analysis (A1 vs. A2, DFS: HR 0.018, 95% CI 0.001-0.240, P = .002; OS: HR 0.005, 95% CI 0.000-0.170, P = .003).The diagnosis of OBC will need continuous improvement with advances of diagnostic breast imaging. Modified radical mastectomy + RT is still a safe and effective choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.